互联网平台企业免费定价反垄断规制批判

Criticism to the Regulation of the Free Pricing of Internet Platform Companies by Antitrust Law

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

杨文明

作者:

杨文明

摘要:

互联网平台企业的竞争行为深受双边市场影响,由于交叉网络外部性、需求价格弹性以及用户归属性等因素的存在,平台企业实施倾斜性定价结构,在一边市场免费定价。免费定价极易与掠夺性定价行为混淆而招致反垄断规制。但就市场结构而言,免费产品相关市场难以界定,因而企业市场支配地位无法证成。就行为构成看,无论依成本标准还是损失补偿标准,免费定价都难以符合掠夺性定价的一般构成。论竞争效果,免费定价不影响同等效率竞争者竞争,且能增进消费者及社会的福利。从排除合理化抗辩角度而论,免费定价已成为互联网领域独特商业模式,实乃互联网平台企业经营所需。因此,将互联网平台企业免费定价视为掠夺性定价的观点是伪命题。

出版日期:

2015-01-28

学科:

国民经济学

收录:

北大核心期刊; 中国科技核心期刊; CSSCI

提交日期

2018-01-11

引用参考

杨文明. 互联网平台企业免费定价反垄断规制批判[J]. 广东财经大学学报,2015(01):104-113.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 互联网平台企业免费定价反垄断规制批判
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 杨文明
  • dc.contributor.author
  • YANG Wen-ming;School of Economic Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学经济法学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 广东财经大学学报
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Guangdong University of Finance & Economics
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2015
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 104-113
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2015-01-28
  • dc.subject
  • 互联网平台;;双边市场;;免费定价;;掠夺性定价;;反垄断法
  • dc.subject
  • internet platform;;two-sided markets;;free pricing;;predatory pricing;;antitrust law
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 互联网平台企业的竞争行为深受双边市场影响,由于交叉网络外部性、需求价格弹性以及用户归属性等因素的存在,平台企业实施倾斜性定价结构,在一边市场免费定价。免费定价极易与掠夺性定价行为混淆而招致反垄断规制。但就市场结构而言,免费产品相关市场难以界定,因而企业市场支配地位无法证成。就行为构成看,无论依成本标准还是损失补偿标准,免费定价都难以符合掠夺性定价的一般构成。论竞争效果,免费定价不影响同等效率竞争者竞争,且能增进消费者及社会的福利。从排除合理化抗辩角度而论,免费定价已成为互联网领域独特商业模式,实乃互联网平台企业经营所需。因此,将互联网平台企业免费定价视为掠夺性定价的观点是伪命题。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The competitive behavior of internet platform companies is affected by two-sided markets. Under the influence of crossing network externality,the price elasticity of demand,single-homing / multi-homing and other factors,the platform firms adopt a skewed price strategy,and the side of weaker crossing network externality is charged a free price. Free pricing is easily confused with predatory pricing behavior and incurs the regulation of antitrust law. But the definition of relevant market on free product is difficult,so the internet platform companies don't have a dominant market position. No matter according to the cost standard or recoupment standard,free pricing is difficult to comply with the general form of predatory pricing. In terms of competitive effects,free pricing can't exclude equally efficient competitors,and it is conducive to the welfare of consumers and society. Free pricing has become a popular business model in the field of internet,and has become the business need of internet platform companies. Therefore,the point of view that the free pricing of internet platform companies is regarded as predatory pricing is actually a false proposition.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 国家社会科学基金西部项目(13XFX021);; 西南政法大学2014年度研究生科研创新计划项目(XZYJS2014010)
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 44-1711/F
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1008-2506
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • F49;F203
回到顶部