量刑反制定罪之权衡与选择

On Selections and Tradeoffs of Reverse Restriction of Conviction to Sentencing

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

陈世伟

归属院系：

法学院

作者：

石璐 ; 陈世伟

摘要：

在传统刑法理论中,罪刑关系一直被描述为"刑从罪生、刑当其罪"的单向性关系。而司法实践中出现的"定罪准确、量刑不公"的现象使得部分学者开始强调定罪与量刑的双向关系,从而提出在特殊情况下,量刑可以反制定罪。反对者和支持者各执一词,反对者站在较为保守的立场力求保证大多数的正义,支持者则认为法官可以担负起实现个案正义的重任。在当前的司法改革大背景下,量刑反制定罪可以有其存在的土壤。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2016-04-05

学科：

刑法学

提交日期：

2018-01-11

引用参考：

石璐;陈世伟. 量刑反制定罪之权衡与选择[J]. 广西警官高等专科学校学报,2016(02):24-28.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 量刑反制定罪之权衡与选择
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 石璐;陈世伟
  • dc.contributor.author
  • SHI Lu;CHEN Shi-wei;School of Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学法学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 广西警官高等专科学校学报
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Guangxi Police Academy
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2016
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 02
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.29;No.130
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 24-28
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2016-04-05
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 定罪;;量刑;;量刑反制定罪;;罪刑法定;;个案正义
  • dc.subject
  • conviction;;sentencing;;reverse restriction of conviction to sentencing;;statutory crime and penalty;;justice in a case
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 在传统刑法理论中,罪刑关系一直被描述为"刑从罪生、刑当其罪"的单向性关系。而司法实践中出现的"定罪准确、量刑不公"的现象使得部分学者开始强调定罪与量刑的双向关系,从而提出在特殊情况下,量刑可以反制定罪。反对者和支持者各执一词,反对者站在较为保守的立场力求保证大多数的正义,支持者则认为法官可以担负起实现个案正义的重任。在当前的司法改革大背景下,量刑反制定罪可以有其存在的土壤。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • In traditional criminal law theory, crime-penalty relation has been described as unipolarity relation,meaning that penalty is attributed to crimes, which deserves the former. There emerges accurate conviction and unjust sentencing in judicial practice, resulting in some scholars' emphsis on two-way relation between conviction and sentencing, and thus reverse restriction of conviction to sentencing is proposed. The opponent and supporter each sticks to his argument, the former standing in the stance of those comparatively conservative, striving for a guarantee of majority of the justice, while the latter arguing for the judge's ability to bear the burden of justice in a case. In the context of the current judicial reform, there exist space for reverse restriction of conviction to sentencing.
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 45-1333/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1008-9438
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.059
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D924.1
回到顶部