联名信对量刑的影响研究

Research on Influence of Joint Letter on Sentencing

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

陈世伟

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

陈世伟 ;石璐

摘要:

联名信作为民意表达方式之一,在刑事案件中并不少见。但何为联名信,联名信的地位究竟如何,联名信能否影响刑事司法裁判等问题一直没有明确答案。联名信具有朴实性、非专业性、易受影响性等与一般民意相同的特点,应被审慎对待。但联名信又具有案件结果与联名者的密切相关性、客观性、全面性的特征,并且联名信的部分内容能够反映与案件及当事人相关的信息,从而可以影响量刑。司法裁判者负有嫁接起朴素道德观念与法治价值的重任,因而既不能对联名信视而不见,也不应对其曲意逢迎,而应汲取其中的合理部分,增强民众对司法的认同感与信任度。

语种:

中文

出版日期:

2016-10-15

学科:

刑法学

提交日期

2018-01-11

引用参考

陈世伟;石璐. 联名信对量刑的影响研究[J]. 湖北警官学院学报,2016(05):37-43.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 联名信对量刑的影响研究
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 陈世伟;石璐
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Chen Shiwei;Shi Lu;Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学法学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 湖北警官学院学报
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Hubei University of Police
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2016
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 05
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.29;No.176
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 37-43
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2016-10-15
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 联名信;;民意;;刑事司法;;量刑
  • dc.subject
  • Joint Letter;;Public Opinion;;Criminal Justice;;Sentencing
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 联名信作为民意表达方式之一,在刑事案件中并不少见。但何为联名信,联名信的地位究竟如何,联名信能否影响刑事司法裁判等问题一直没有明确答案。联名信具有朴实性、非专业性、易受影响性等与一般民意相同的特点,应被审慎对待。但联名信又具有案件结果与联名者的密切相关性、客观性、全面性的特征,并且联名信的部分内容能够反映与案件及当事人相关的信息,从而可以影响量刑。司法裁判者负有嫁接起朴素道德观念与法治价值的重任,因而既不能对联名信视而不见,也不应对其曲意逢迎,而应汲取其中的合理部分,增强民众对司法的认同感与信任度。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • As one of the expression ways of public opinion, the joint letter is common in criminal cases. But as to what is a joint letter, what is the status of the joint letter, and whether the joint letter can influence the criminal judicial decision,there has been no specific answers. The joint letter is simple, non-professional and susceptible, which are common characteristics with the general public opinion. Therefore, the joint letter should be treated carefully. But the joint letter also has other characteristics such as, the close correlation between the case result and joint signatories, objectivity and comprehensiveness, and the partial content of the joint letter can reflect the information related to the case and litigants, thus influencing the sentencing. The judicial judge has the responsibility of linking the simple moral ideas and value of rule-of-law. Therefore, the judicial judge should neither ignore the joint letter nor flatter it, but should absorb the reasonable parts to enhance people's recognition and trust towards the judiciary.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 西南政法大学法学院2014级研究生科研创新项目(FXY2014047)
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 42-1743/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1673-2391
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.082
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D924.1
回到顶部