与总则共同犯罪理论有关的若干分则术语研究

Research on Some Terminologies of the Special Provisions of Criminal Law Related to the Joint Crime Theories of the General Provisions of Criminal Law

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

丁胜明

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

丁胜明

导师:

梅传强

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

共同犯罪;解释;术语;教唆;帮助;组织

摘要:

我国刑法典的总则和分则使用了很多相同或者近义的术语,而这些术语大多出现在共同犯罪或疑似共同犯罪的环境中。这些术语的使用,使刑法的适用面临着一个紧迫的问题:使用这些术语表达构成要件的分则罪名和相关犯罪的共同犯罪之间是何种关系?这种关系不外乎三种:重合、交叉或者互斥。而研究使用不同术语表达构成要件的犯罪与相关犯罪的共同犯罪之间到底是哪一种关系,对于我们准确的定罪量刑有着重要的意义。本文即以这些术语为主线,分析此类犯罪和共同犯罪理论的界限,厘清分则和总则的关系;而分析的方法即为刑法学的解释方法,包括文义解释、文理解释、体系解释、目的解释等方法,同时还涉及到主观的解释论和客观的解释论的问题。 全文一共分为三个部分,主要内容摘要如下: 第一部分,分析了出现大量共犯术语的原因。首要原因是法律术语不可避免的多义和近义。有些犯罪和共同犯罪并无关系,但是其构成要件中不可避免会使用一些容易使人误以为是共犯问题的术语,这是由于语言不可避免的多义和近义引起的。如教唆他人吸毒罪,和共同犯罪中的教唆犯并无特别关系,但是又必须使用“教唆”一词。其次是分则对总则原理的展开。总则内容是对分则规定的抽象,分则则是对总则的展开,如组织黑社会性质组织罪就是对总则犯罪集团问题的展开。三是分则的特别规定,刑法分则将一些本来是共同犯罪的行为明确规定为独立的犯罪,并明确规定其法定刑,防止法官量刑上的不当,如协助组织卖淫罪就是对组织卖淫罪的帮助犯在分则中的特别规定。 第二部分,分析了共犯术语的解释方法。首先要明确解释共犯术语的基本思路。正确的做法应当是,从每个术语本身所具有的自然语义出发,再使用其他刑法学的解释方法进行解释。其次分析了刑法学解释方法与分则共犯术语的解释。在共犯术语的解释问题上,更多地要使用客观解释论的立场,因为立法意思在很多情况下是不明确的;在方法上,要更多地强调文理解释法。第三,分析了对分则术语不同规范含义的不同处理。 第三部分,具体分析了与共同犯罪理论有关的若干分则术语的解释问题。这部分分别从三种狭义的共犯即教唆犯、帮助犯、组织犯进行展开,探讨了分则中的教唆、煽动、帮助、资助、介绍以及组织与相关犯罪的共同犯罪之间的关系。

学科:

刑法学

提交日期

2018-01-11

引用参考

丁胜明. 与总则共同犯罪理论有关的若干分则术语研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2010.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 与总则共同犯罪理论有关的若干分则术语研究
  • dc.title
  • Research on Some Terminologies of the Special Provisions of Criminal Law Related to the Joint Crime Theories of the General Provisions of Criminal Law
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20070301040590
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 丁胜明
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2010
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 梅传强
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 共同犯罪;;解释;;术语;;教唆;;帮助;;组织
  • dc.subject
  • joint offence;; interpretation;; terminology;; abetment;; assistance;; organize
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 我国刑法典的总则和分则使用了很多相同或者近义的术语,而这些术语大多出现在共同犯罪或疑似共同犯罪的环境中。这些术语的使用,使刑法的适用面临着一个紧迫的问题:使用这些术语表达构成要件的分则罪名和相关犯罪的共同犯罪之间是何种关系?这种关系不外乎三种:重合、交叉或者互斥。而研究使用不同术语表达构成要件的犯罪与相关犯罪的共同犯罪之间到底是哪一种关系,对于我们准确的定罪量刑有着重要的意义。本文即以这些术语为主线,分析此类犯罪和共同犯罪理论的界限,厘清分则和总则的关系;而分析的方法即为刑法学的解释方法,包括文义解释、文理解释、体系解释、目的解释等方法,同时还涉及到主观的解释论和客观的解释论的问题。 全文一共分为三个部分,主要内容摘要如下: 第一部分,分析了出现大量共犯术语的原因。首要原因是法律术语不可避免的多义和近义。有些犯罪和共同犯罪并无关系,但是其构成要件中不可避免会使用一些容易使人误以为是共犯问题的术语,这是由于语言不可避免的多义和近义引起的。如教唆他人吸毒罪,和共同犯罪中的教唆犯并无特别关系,但是又必须使用“教唆”一词。其次是分则对总则原理的展开。总则内容是对分则规定的抽象,分则则是对总则的展开,如组织黑社会性质组织罪就是对总则犯罪集团问题的展开。三是分则的特别规定,刑法分则将一些本来是共同犯罪的行为明确规定为独立的犯罪,并明确规定其法定刑,防止法官量刑上的不当,如协助组织卖淫罪就是对组织卖淫罪的帮助犯在分则中的特别规定。 第二部分,分析了共犯术语的解释方法。首先要明确解释共犯术语的基本思路。正确的做法应当是,从每个术语本身所具有的自然语义出发,再使用其他刑法学的解释方法进行解释。其次分析了刑法学解释方法与分则共犯术语的解释。在共犯术语的解释问题上,更多地要使用客观解释论的立场,因为立法意思在很多情况下是不明确的;在方法上,要更多地强调文理解释法。第三,分析了对分则术语不同规范含义的不同处理。 第三部分,具体分析了与共同犯罪理论有关的若干分则术语的解释问题。这部分分别从三种狭义的共犯即教唆犯、帮助犯、组织犯进行展开,探讨了分则中的教唆、煽动、帮助、资助、介绍以及组织与相关犯罪的共同犯罪之间的关系。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Many terminologies or their synonyms, which mostly appear in the situation of joint offence or suspected joint offense, are used in the General Provisions and Special Provisions of Chines Criminal Law. Then there is a pressing problem for the applica-tion of Criminal Law: What is the relationship between the crime in the Special Provi-sions of Criminal Law, with its constitutive elements conveyed by these teminologies, and the related joint offense? There are three types of relationship like overlaping, intersection or exclusion. Research on these relationships is of great significance to the accurate conviction and measurement of penalty. The article takes these terminologies as the thread mainly to analyze the restrictions between the theory of this kind of crime and joint offense through the interpretation of Criminal Law Study, including literal interpretation, literal analysis, systematic interpretation and teleological interpretation, which also involves the problem of subjectivism and ob-jectivism, so as to clarify the relationship between the Special Principles and the General Provisions of Criminal Law. The article is divided into three parts, with its main content to be as follows: The first part analyzes the reason of so many terminologies of joint offense appeared.The first reason is polysemy and near-synonymy which are unavoidable in legal terminology. Some crime has nothing to do with joint offense, but there are some terminologies, which will easily make people take for the terminologies of joint offense, unavoidably used in its con-stitutive elements because of unavoidale polysemy and near-synonymy of language. For ex-ample, the crime of abetting someone addic-ting and injecting drugs, although it bears no particular relationship to the abetment in joint offense, we have to use the word“abetment”. The second reason is that the Special Provisions of Criminal Law explains the General Provisions of Criminal Law. The content of the General Provisions of Criminal Law is an abstraction of the Special Provisions of Criminal Law, while the Special Provisions of Criminal Law is the explaination, for example, the crime of organizing mafia-style gangs is the explaina-tion of the problem of criminal group in the General Provisions of Criminal Law. The third reason is the Special Provisions of Criminal Law in that it clearly stipulates some acts of joint offense as independent crime, and specifies its legal punishment to prevent judge’s inappropriate sentencing, such as the specifies in the Special Provi-sions of Criminal Law that the crime of assisting in the organization of prostitu-tion is the accessory offender to the crime of organized prostitution. The second part analyzes how to interpret the terminology of joint offense. Firstly is to explain precisely the basic concept of the terminology of joint offense. Based on the natural semantics of each terminology, the correct procedure is to interpret each terminology by means of other interpretation method of Criminal Law Study. Second-ly is to analyze the interpretation method of Criminal Law Study and the terminology of joint offense in the Special Provisions of Criminal Law. On the interpretation of the terminology of joint offense, objectivism should be used more because the mean of legislation is ambiguous in many cases and on the method, literal analysis should be emphasized more. Thirdly is to analyze different interpretation to different implication of terminology in the Special Provisions of Criminal Law. The third part specifies the interpretation of some terminologies of the Special Provisions of Criminal Law related to the theory of joint crime and discusses the relationship between abetment, incitement, assistance, financial assistance, recom-mendation as well as organization and the related joint offense, launching from three types of joint offense in the narrowest sense, such as abetment, assistment and organizing crime.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D924.1
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2010-03-01
回到顶部