欧盟统一国际私法与德国国际私法欧盟化

Unified Private International Law in EU and the Europeanization of the Private International Law in Germany

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

刘畅

归属院系:

国际法学院

作者:

刘畅

导师:

裴普

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

欧盟统一国际私法;国际民事诉讼程序法;布鲁塞尔体系;民商事管辖权;判决的承认与执行

摘要:

第二次世界大战之后,随着国际经济交往和国际民商事关系的发展,传统的缺乏灵活性的冲突规范已经难以适应新的需要,而不断涌现出的各国国内立法配合相继缔结的国际公约,以及层出不穷的国际私法新理论,推动着国际私法学说日新月异的发展。其中,欧盟统一国际私法作为区域性国际私法统一运动的代表,为国际私法趋同化,做出了有益的探索。同时,在欧盟成员国内部,国际私法的欧盟化也作为一大趋势传播开来。其中,国际民事诉讼程序法是欧盟统一化中发展最为迅速的领域。 欧盟从建立之初至今,通过了一系列公约、条例和指令等协调民商事管辖权以及判决的承认与执行方面的冲突,为实现其判决“自由流动”的目标进行着不懈的努力。尤其是从《布鲁塞尔公约》到《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅰ》、《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅱ》和《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅱa》的布鲁塞尔体系为代表,形成了一套协调区际民商事管辖权以及判决的承认与执行冲突的规则体系范本。 本文通过法律解释和法律推理的方法,综合实证分析与法律比较的思路,以布鲁塞尔体系在德国的承认和执行为参照,介绍并分析布鲁塞尔体系下德国国际民事诉讼程序法的欧盟化,从而对欧盟统一国际私法的区际性协调进行具体的透视。

学科:

国际法学

提交日期

2018-01-11

引用参考

刘畅. 欧盟统一国际私法与德国国际私法欧盟化[D]. 西南政法大学,2011.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 欧盟统一国际私法与德国国际私法欧盟化
  • dc.title
  • Unified Private International Law in EU and the Europeanization of the Private International Law in Germany
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20080301090749
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 刘畅
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2011
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 裴普
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 欧盟统一国际私法;;国际民事诉讼程序法;;布鲁塞尔体系;;民商事管辖权;;判决的承认与执行
  • dc.subject
  • Unified private international law in EU ;;International Civil Practice Law;;Brussels system;;civil and commercial jurisdiction;;judgment recognition and enforcement
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 第二次世界大战之后,随着国际经济交往和国际民商事关系的发展,传统的缺乏灵活性的冲突规范已经难以适应新的需要,而不断涌现出的各国国内立法配合相继缔结的国际公约,以及层出不穷的国际私法新理论,推动着国际私法学说日新月异的发展。其中,欧盟统一国际私法作为区域性国际私法统一运动的代表,为国际私法趋同化,做出了有益的探索。同时,在欧盟成员国内部,国际私法的欧盟化也作为一大趋势传播开来。其中,国际民事诉讼程序法是欧盟统一化中发展最为迅速的领域。 欧盟从建立之初至今,通过了一系列公约、条例和指令等协调民商事管辖权以及判决的承认与执行方面的冲突,为实现其判决“自由流动”的目标进行着不懈的努力。尤其是从《布鲁塞尔公约》到《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅰ》、《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅱ》和《布鲁塞尔条例Ⅱa》的布鲁塞尔体系为代表,形成了一套协调区际民商事管辖权以及判决的承认与执行冲突的规则体系范本。 本文通过法律解释和法律推理的方法,综合实证分析与法律比较的思路,以布鲁塞尔体系在德国的承认和执行为参照,介绍并分析布鲁塞尔体系下德国国际民事诉讼程序法的欧盟化,从而对欧盟统一国际私法的区际性协调进行具体的透视。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • After the Second World War, with the development of the international economy association and international Civil and Business relationships, traditional conflict norms lack of flexibility fail to meet with new demands. Emergences of national legislations within different nations together with corresponding international agreements and numerous newly established theories of private international law boost the advancement of private international law theories. As the representative of regional private international law movement, Unified private international law in EU provides beneficial exploration for the assimilation of private international law. Meanwhile, as a primary trend, Europeanization of the private international law has permeated among EU member countries. International Civil Practice Law is the fastest developing field in the Europeanization. From the establishment of EU until now, great efforts have been made to achieve the objective of“free flow of judgment”through a series of convention, treaties and orders to coordinate the civil and commercial jurisdiction as well as conflicts in judgment recognition and enforcement. Especially for the Brussels system, which includes Brussels Convention, Treaty I of Brussels, Treaty II of Brussels and Treaty II a of Brussels, it forms a set of ruling system models to coordinate the civil and commercial jurisdiction as well as conflicts in judgment recognition and enforcement. Using Brussels system’s recognition and enforcement in Germany as the referenced example, this thesis introduces and analyzes the Europeanization of German international civil procedures under the Brussels system and further provides detailed insights of regional coordination of the Unified private international law in EU.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D997
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2011-03-25
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2011-05-01
回到顶部