Empirical Propositions and the Change of Language-Games

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

李果

归属院系:

马克思主义学院

作者:

Li Guo

摘要:

People unavoidably provide reasons for their words and deeds when reasoning in a language-game. Wittgenstein thinks that when people in different language-games argue with one other, they insist on adopting a doubtful attitude toward the reasons provided by the other side. His use of the term "language-game" here is a metaphor, and implies that people in different cultures can scarcely reason with one another. Indeed, according to Wittgenstein's consideration of concepts of logic in On Certainty, language-games are incompatible with one another because their internal logic and reasons are different from each other. However, in his discussion of empirical propositions Wittgenstein has also shown us the possibility that the internal reasons of one language-game can transmit beyond its own borders and be valid in another language-game.

语种:

英文

出版日期:

2016

学科:

哲学

收录:

ESCI

提交日期

2018-01-11

引用参考

Li Guo. Empirical Propositions and the Change of Language-Games[J]. FRONTIERS OF PHILOSOPHY IN CHINA,2016(1):21-34.

  • dc.title
  • Empirical Propositions and the Change of Language-Games
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Li Guo
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • Southwest Univ Polit Sci & Law, Sch Maxism, Chongqing 401120, Peoples R China
  • dc.contributor.corresponding
  • Li, G (reprint author), Southwest Univ Polit Sci & Law, Sch Maxism, Chongqing 401120, Peoples R China.
  • dc.publisher
  • FRONTIERS OF PHILOSOPHY IN CHINA
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2016
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 1
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • 11
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 21-34
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2016
  • dc.language.iso
  • 英文
  • dc.subject
  • logical propositions; persuasion; general empirical proposition; local empirical proposition
  • dc.description.abstract
  • People unavoidably provide reasons for their words and deeds when reasoning in a language-game. Wittgenstein thinks that when people in different language-games argue with one other, they insist on adopting a doubtful attitude toward the reasons provided by the other side. His use of the term "language-game" here is a metaphor, and implies that people in different cultures can scarcely reason with one another. Indeed, according to Wittgenstein's consideration of concepts of logic in On Certainty, language-games are incompatible with one another because their internal logic and reasons are different from each other. However, in his discussion of empirical propositions Wittgenstein has also shown us the possibility that the internal reasons of one language-game can transmit beyond its own borders and be valid in another language-game.
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1673-3436
回到顶部