司法建议:法院的公共治理之道?

Judicial suggestions:the public governance approach adopted by the courts?

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

黄茂钦

作者:

黄茂钦 ;尹亚军

摘要:

恪守中立、公正、客观、被动的社会立场被认为是法院的理想形象,但司法实践则展示出法院审判职能明显的扩张趋势,其中,司法建议即为其非司法化手段之一。司法建议制度的提出已是30年前之事,实践中也常有运用,2007年、2012年颁发的两份文件将其推向普遍化、制度化、规范化的进路。但尽管如此,对司法建议的批评与赞誉参半,关于司法建议废止与存续的争议仍未止息,此皆源于对人民法院角色定位的认识差异。在公共治理的时代语境之下,传统的思维定式需要被重新审视或打破。不管是从司法审判之社会功能的理想性与局限性视角,还是从司法建议自身独立的价值来看,司法建议都有其存在的必要性,这在深层次上反映了硬法与软法协同治理的布局。当然,司法建议制度仍还有改良的必要。

语种:

中文

出版日期:

2018-02-01

学科:

民商法学

提交日期

2018-04-20

引用参考

黄茂钦;尹亚军. 司法建议:法院的公共治理之道?[J]. 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版),2018(03):43-50.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 司法建议:法院的公共治理之道?
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 黄茂钦;尹亚军
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Huang Maoqin;Yin Yajun;School of Economic Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law;School of Law, Shenzhen University
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学经济法学院;深圳大学法学院;
  • dc.publisher
  • 辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版)
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Liaoning Normal University(Social Science Edition)
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2018
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 03
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.41;No.239
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 43-50
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2018-02-01
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 司法建议;;公共治理;;司法能力;;社会责任;;软法
  • dc.subject
  • judicial suggestion;;public governance;;judicial capacity;;social responsibility;;soft law
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 恪守中立、公正、客观、被动的社会立场被认为是法院的理想形象,但司法实践则展示出法院审判职能明显的扩张趋势,其中,司法建议即为其非司法化手段之一。司法建议制度的提出已是30年前之事,实践中也常有运用,2007年、2012年颁发的两份文件将其推向普遍化、制度化、规范化的进路。但尽管如此,对司法建议的批评与赞誉参半,关于司法建议废止与存续的争议仍未止息,此皆源于对人民法院角色定位的认识差异。在公共治理的时代语境之下,传统的思维定式需要被重新审视或打破。不管是从司法审判之社会功能的理想性与局限性视角,还是从司法建议自身独立的价值来看,司法建议都有其存在的必要性,这在深层次上反映了硬法与软法协同治理的布局。当然,司法建议制度仍还有改良的必要。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The position of neutrality,impartiality,objectivity and passivity is regarded as the ideal image of the court.But the judicial practice shows the obvious expansion trend of court trial function.Among them,the judicial suggestion is one of its "non judicial" means.It was thirty years ago that the judicial suggestion system was put forward,and it was also used in practice.In 2007 and 2012,the judicial suggestion was pushed to the general,institutionalized and standardized way through the implementation of two documents.Even so,the criticisms and praises of the judicial suggestion was mixed,and the dispute of abolishment and survival not yet ceased.It all comes from the cognition difference of the role of the people's court.In the context of the era of public governance,traditional stereotypes need to be reexamined or broken.Whether from the perspective of the ideal and limitation of the social function of judicial trial or from the value of its own independence,judicial suggestion has its existence necessity.From a deeper point of view,this reflects the coordination of hard law and soft law.Of course,there is still a need for improvement of the system of judicial suggestion.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 司法部国家法治与法学理论研究中青年项目“经济领域的软法之治:理论辨析与实证考察”(13SFB3033)
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 21-1077/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1000-1751
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.235
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D926.2
回到顶部