私募股权基金管理人信义义务研究

Study on the Fiduciary Duty of Private Equity Fund Managers

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

肖杭

导师:

曹泮天

导师单位:

经济法学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

信义义务;勤勉义务;忠实义务;基金管理人;私募股权基金

摘要:

近年来,私募股权基金成为许多投资者推崇的投资产品,然而在其高回报的同时,也隐藏着巨大的风险,基金管理人违背信义义务,投资者未能收回本金的案件大量发生。私募股权基金管理人是基金管理和运作的核心,拥有着巨大的管理权限,而投资者对于基金事务却少有参与,在损失发生后很难通过民事诉讼获得救济。鉴于此,本文采用规范研究、实证研究分析方法,通过对我国私募基金管理人信义义务规范、信义义务司法案例以及私募基金管理人行政监管现状的考察,寻求完善我国私募股权基金管理人信义义务的具体路径,以期实现投资者在私募股权基金投资中得到更好的保护。除引言外,本文分为四个部分,主要内容如下:第一部分首先介绍私募股权基金管理人信义义务的概念及来源,明确基金管理人信义义务产生于当事人间的信义关系;其次介绍私募股权基金管理人信义义务的特殊之处,私募股权基金投资者退出不自由,因而基金管理人的信义义务强度更大;同时,由于私募股权基金所受行政监管不如公募基金严格,因此基金管理人信义义务的履行更加依靠司法救济等手段。第二部分是对私募股权基金管理人信义义务的现状考察。首先是对我国私募股权基金管理人信义义务规范的介绍;其次是对投资者与私募股权基金管理人纠纷的司法案例进行分析,发现部分投资者与基金管理人信义关系异化,致使信义义务不受重视;最后是对私募基金管理人的行政监管现状进行研究,发现基金管理人的大量登记,也是造成私募基金市场混乱,基金管理人违背信义义务多发的原因之一。第三部分重点剖析了私募股权基金管理人信义义务存在的问题。首先,由于我国在移植信义义务时着重对具体规则的引入而缺乏对信义义务概念的整体引入,造成信义义务规范识别及适用困难;其次,当前规范之中对勤勉义务仅有概括规定,对其内涵及具体判断标准均未规定,难以为司法实践提供指引;再次,私募股权基金投资者司法救济路径不畅,投资者主张基金管理人违背信义义务时,面临着举证难度过大、法院不主动介入基金事务审理的难题;最后,在行政监管上,存在着基金管理人登记制度过于宽松,监管信息供给不足,支持起诉职能不明确等问题。最后,针对发现的问题提出完善的建议。第一是统一信义义务规范,未来可以在民法典之中将信义义务列为诚实信用原则的下位概念,解决信义义务规范的识别及适用难题。第二是借鉴美国谨慎人投资规则,制定我国的《谨慎人投资法》为勤勉义务的判断提供标准。第三是通过加重基金管理人举证责任、在基金案件审理中取消“隐性”的行政前置、增加自律性组织支持诉讼职能的规定为投资者提供更好的司法救济。第四,在行政监管层面,采用加大基金管理人信息供给、适度提高基金管理人登记标准以及协调政策衔接等方式完善对基金管理人事前、事中监管。

学科:

经济法学

提交日期

2018-04-20

引用参考

肖杭. 私募股权基金管理人信义义务研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2017.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 私募股权基金管理人信义义务研究
  • dc.title
  • Study on the Fiduciary Duty of Private Equity Fund Managers
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20140301070557
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 肖杭
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 经济法学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法学硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2017
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 曹泮天
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 经济法学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 信义义务;勤勉义务;忠实义务;基金管理人;私募股权基金
  • dc.subject
  • fiduciary duty;duty of care;duty of loyalty;fund managers;private equity
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 近年来,私募股权基金成为许多投资者推崇的投资产品,然而在其高回报的同时,也隐藏着巨大的风险,基金管理人违背信义义务,投资者未能收回本金的案件大量发生。私募股权基金管理人是基金管理和运作的核心,拥有着巨大的管理权限,而投资者对于基金事务却少有参与,在损失发生后很难通过民事诉讼获得救济。鉴于此,本文采用规范研究、实证研究分析方法,通过对我国私募基金管理人信义义务规范、信义义务司法案例以及私募基金管理人行政监管现状的考察,寻求完善我国私募股权基金管理人信义义务的具体路径,以期实现投资者在私募股权基金投资中得到更好的保护。除引言外,本文分为四个部分,主要内容如下:第一部分首先介绍私募股权基金管理人信义义务的概念及来源,明确基金管理人信义义务产生于当事人间的信义关系;其次介绍私募股权基金管理人信义义务的特殊之处,私募股权基金投资者退出不自由,因而基金管理人的信义义务强度更大;同时,由于私募股权基金所受行政监管不如公募基金严格,因此基金管理人信义义务的履行更加依靠司法救济等手段。第二部分是对私募股权基金管理人信义义务的现状考察。首先是对我国私募股权基金管理人信义义务规范的介绍;其次是对投资者与私募股权基金管理人纠纷的司法案例进行分析,发现部分投资者与基金管理人信义关系异化,致使信义义务不受重视;最后是对私募基金管理人的行政监管现状进行研究,发现基金管理人的大量登记,也是造成私募基金市场混乱,基金管理人违背信义义务多发的原因之一。第三部分重点剖析了私募股权基金管理人信义义务存在的问题。首先,由于我国在移植信义义务时着重对具体规则的引入而缺乏对信义义务概念的整体引入,造成信义义务规范识别及适用困难;其次,当前规范之中对勤勉义务仅有概括规定,对其内涵及具体判断标准均未规定,难以为司法实践提供指引;再次,私募股权基金投资者司法救济路径不畅,投资者主张基金管理人违背信义义务时,面临着举证难度过大、法院不主动介入基金事务审理的难题;最后,在行政监管上,存在着基金管理人登记制度过于宽松,监管信息供给不足,支持起诉职能不明确等问题。最后,针对发现的问题提出完善的建议。第一是统一信义义务规范,未来可以在民法典之中将信义义务列为诚实信用原则的下位概念,解决信义义务规范的识别及适用难题。第二是借鉴美国谨慎人投资规则,制定我国的《谨慎人投资法》为勤勉义务的判断提供标准。第三是通过加重基金管理人举证责任、在基金案件审理中取消“隐性”的行政前置、增加自律性组织支持诉讼职能的规定为投资者提供更好的司法救济。第四,在行政监管层面,采用加大基金管理人信息供给、适度提高基金管理人登记标准以及协调政策衔接等方式完善对基金管理人事前、事中监管。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Lately,private equity has become a rewarded and respected way of investing.Hidden behind high rewards,huge risks happen among amounts of situations,in which fund managers fail to carry on fiduciary duty,leading to loss of principal.Being certificated large administrative power,fund managers are core of fund in the fund management and operation.In contrast,the investors take little participation in fund affairs,not even fight for civil remedy after the loss being incurred.In view of the above-mentioned facts,this thesis explores fiduciary duty of fund managers in laws and regulations of China,as well as judicial cases,taking investigation in status quo of administration supervision and management.Combined the normative research and positive research,this thesis seeks to give investors better protection in private equity investment,by means of seeking specific path to fulfill fiduciary duty of fund managers in China.In addition to the introduction,this thesis is divided into four parts as follows:The first part introduces the concept and origin of fiduciary duty of fund manager in private equity,deriving fiduciary duty of fund manager from special fiduciary relationship of parties.Then,as investors in private equity fund couldn't exit freely,the particularity of fiduciary duty of fund manager in private equity is explained,that is,fund managers therefore owe stronger fiduciary duty.Meantime,unlike public fund,the private equity is under less strictly administrative supervision,so judicial relief is the most important way of fulfilling the fiduciary duty of fund managers.The second part is to investigate the status que of fiduciary duty of fund manager in private equity.First section is the introduction of fiduciary duty of fund managers in laws and regulations of China.Second section is the analysis of judicial case between investors and private equity fund managers,found the alienation of fiduciary relationship between investors and private equity fund managers,leading the public ignorance of fiduciary duty.Final section is the study of the status of administrative supervision,the large amount of fund managers' rush-into partly leads the private equity into chaos,and breach the fiduciary duty frequently.The third part analyzes the existing problem of fiduciary duty of fund manager in private equity.First and foremost,since in the transplantation of fiduciary duty in early China,specific rules were introduced while the concept fiduciary duty were not,causing difficulties in identifying and applying to laws and regulations.Secondly,in current standard of care of duty,only general provisions is promulgated,without specific connotation and criteria to guide the judicial practice.Thirdly,investors of private equity are in the twists and turns,facing the problem of burden of proof and the absent of court,when seeking for judicial relief because of the breach of fiduciary duty.Fourthly,in the field of administrative supervision,problems include the too-lenient fund manager registration system,the lack of supervision information supply and unclear function of accusation support.Finally,the thesis puts forward some suggestions for the problems.First,make the unity of fiduciary duty standard.The concept of duty of fiduciary can be included into the principle of good faith in the civil code in the future,to figure out identification and application of the fiduciary duty.Second,the United States prudent investment rules can be reference of prudent investment law in China,as a standard of duty of care.Third,better judicial relief for investors can through three ways,including aggravate burden of proof of fund manager,the abolition of the hidden pre-administrative examination and approval in fund case,and make self-discipline organization access to participate in the legal proceedings.Fourth,in the level of administrative supervision,to raise quality and standard before and after the supervision on fund managers,disclosing more information of fund managers,improving the fund manager registration standards appropriately,as well as to improve the convergence among policies,are considerable ways.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D922.291.91
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2017-03-15
回到顶部