论民事法官询问范式及程序约束

On Inquiry Paradigm of Civil Judges and Its Procedural Constraints

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

朱福勇

归属院系：

人工智能法学院（应用法学院）

作者：

朱福勇

摘要：

作为一种后位的、补充性查证方式与手段,法官询问对矫正辩论权主义与处分权主义的缺陷,发现案件真实、促进法官心证确信功效显著。由于我国法官询问缺乏程序法上的规范和约束,导致法官"独白"式询问"策略化"、内心确信的"个性化",一定程度上异化为少数法官与当事人私下交易、权力寻租和获取不法利益之手段。对话逻辑是法官询问的内在依据,在型塑法官询问对话理念、遵循对话原则,从对话条件、对话程度和不当对话救济方面约束法官询问行为的基础上,确保法官与当事人、其他诉讼参与人之间就待证事实展开理性对话,并展现于裁判文书之中,得出公正、合理和当事人乃至于民众可接受的裁判事实和结果,以满足民众对司法公正的正常期待。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2018-11-13

学科：

诉讼法学

收录：

CSSCI; 中国科技核心期刊

提交日期：

2018-12-06

引用参考：

朱福勇. 论民事法官询问范式及程序约束[J]. 法学评论,2018(06):91-102.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论民事法官询问范式及程序约束
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 朱福勇
  • dc.contributor.author
  • ZHU Fuyong
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学;
  • dc.publisher
  • 法学评论
  • dc.publisher
  • Law Review
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2018
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 06
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.36;No.212
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 91-102
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2018-11-13
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 民事审判;;法官询问;;“独白”式询问;;询问对话;;程序约束
  • dc.subject
  • Civil Trial;;Judge's Inquiry;;Monologue-like Inquiry;;Inquiry Dialogue;;Procedural Constraints
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 作为一种后位的、补充性查证方式与手段,法官询问对矫正辩论权主义与处分权主义的缺陷,发现案件真实、促进法官心证确信功效显著。由于我国法官询问缺乏程序法上的规范和约束,导致法官"独白"式询问"策略化"、内心确信的"个性化",一定程度上异化为少数法官与当事人私下交易、权力寻租和获取不法利益之手段。对话逻辑是法官询问的内在依据,在型塑法官询问对话理念、遵循对话原则,从对话条件、对话程度和不当对话救济方面约束法官询问行为的基础上,确保法官与当事人、其他诉讼参与人之间就待证事实展开理性对话,并展现于裁判文书之中,得出公正、合理和当事人乃至于民众可接受的裁判事实和结果,以满足民众对司法公正的正常期待。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • As a postpositional and supplementary verification method,the judge asked about the defects of rightist discourse power and dispensationism,and found that the case was genuine and the judge's conviction was proved conclusive.Due to lack of procedural rules and constraints,the judges in our country have caused the judges to ask'strategic'and confident'individualization'in the form of'soliloquy'.To some extent,they are alienated into private transactions between a few judges and the parties,and the power to rent-seeking and acquisition.The means of illegal interests.Dialogue logic is the internal basis for judges' inquiry.Only when the model judge asks the dialogue idea,follows the dialogue principle,and restricts the judge's inquiry behavior in terms of dialogue conditions,dialogue,and improper dialogue relief,it can ensure the relationship between the judge and the parties and other participants in the proceedings.The facts to be proved are opened to rational dialogue and displayed in the judgment documents,and the facts and results of the adjudication that are fair,reasonable and acceptable to the parties and even to the people who are obtained to meet the people's normal expectation of judicial justice.
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 中国法学会自选课题“风险社会下民事纠纷司法化解问题研究”(CLS2017D141)
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 42-1086/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1004-1303
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.616
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.1
回到顶部