对柏拉图《政治家》291a-303d的解读

An Exposition of Plato’s Statesman 291a-303d

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系：

政治与公共管理学院

作者：

王志强

导师：

程志敏

导师单位：

政治与公共管理学院

学位：

硕士

语种：

其他

关键词：

政治家;政治技艺;政体;模仿

摘要：

　　文摘　　　　本论文重点对柏拉图的政治家291 - 303 d为了系统地介绍和精确地以政治体制理论的对话。　　　　首先,如果你花的戏剧的政治家是柏拉图,它会伴随着柏拉图的其它对话。例如,柏拉图的Theaetetus-Sophist-Statesman是一个三部曲的指导主题是知识。在《泰德的尾声,苏格拉底概述已经谈三个答案的问题的年轻的苏格拉底取代了《泰德在“阶段”,让他休息一下。因此客人和年轻苏格拉底开始讲"政治家”。在政治家,客人名义上的承诺苏格拉底完成演讲的政治家,但实际上会通过政治艺术(科学)和年轻的苏格拉底。通过连续三diaeresises,客人逐渐使真正的政治家平原看所有的人。首先,英国皇家和政治艺术是human-grazin

学科：

政治学理论

提交日期：

2019-04-11

引用参考：

王志强. 对柏拉图《政治家》291a-303d的解读[D]. 西南政法大学,2012.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 对柏拉图《政治家》291a-303d的解读
  • dc.title
  • An Exposition of Plato’s Statesman 291a-303d
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20090302011269
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 王志强
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 政治与公共管理学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法学硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2012
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 程志敏
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 政治与公共管理学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 其他
  • dc.subject
  • 政治家;政治技艺;政体;模仿
  • dc.subject
  • Statesman;Political Art;Regime;Imitation
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 　　文摘　　　　本论文重点对柏拉图的政治家291 - 303 d为了系统地介绍和精确地以政治体制理论的对话。　　　　首先,如果你花的戏剧的政治家是柏拉图,它会伴随着柏拉图的其它对话。例如,柏拉图的Theaetetus-Sophist-Statesman是一个三部曲的指导主题是知识。在《泰德的尾声,苏格拉底概述已经谈三个答案的问题的年轻的苏格拉底取代了《泰德在“阶段”,让他休息一下。因此客人和年轻苏格拉底开始讲"政治家”。在政治家,客人名义上的承诺苏格拉底完成演讲的政治家,但实际上会通过政治艺术(科学)和年轻的苏格拉底。通过连续三diaeresises,客人逐渐使真正的政治家平原看所有的人。首先,英国皇家和政治艺术是human-grazin
  • dc.description.abstract
  • AbstractThis thesis focuses on Plato’s Statesman 291a-303d with a view to systematically introducing and precisely interpretating the political regime theory of the dialogue.Above all, if one takes the Statesman as a drama of Plato, it would be associated with Plato’s other dialogues. For example, Plato’s Theaetetus-Sophist-Statesman is a trilogy whose guiding theme is knowledge. In epilogue of the Theaetetus, Socrates summarizes what has been said about the three answers of Theaetetus to the question “What it is knowledge?” Neither “perception” nor “ture opinion,” nor “true opinion with an added account or designation,” could be knowledge. In the Sophist, a guest (or stranger) from Elea is present, who goes through “Sophist” together with Theaetetus by questions. Having divided arts for two times, at last the guest and Theaetetus find the Sophist and confirm their “generation and blood”.The name “Sophist” means: compelling a man to contradict himself and doing so in a dissembling way, pursuing opinionated imitation while imitating knowledgeable people, thus producing what seems to be like something—all this belongs to the image–producing art —the human one, not the devine—which is part of the production proper to the Sophoist; the guest adds to the “productive” activity of the Sophist his “wonder-working”, which had mentioned before.Young Socrates takes the place of Theaetetus to be on the “stage” so as to let him have a rest.Thus the guest and Young Socrates start to speak of “statesman”. In the Statesman, the guest nominally promises to Socrates completion of the speech about the statesman，but practically goes through the political art (science) with young Socrates. By three successive diaeresises, the guest gradually makes the genuine look of statesman plain to all of them . Firstly, the royal and political art is the human-grazing part assigned to the two-footed herd(267c); Secondly, the political art of the true king and statesman is the voluntary herd-grooming of voluntary two-footed animals(276e). Finally, that which rules over all of these and the laws, cares for all the things throughout a city, and weaves them all together most correctlly—should we comprehend its power by the designation of the common, we would address it most justly, it seems, as political (science)(305e).According to the guest’s speeches and deeds in the Sophist and the Statesman, we suspect that the guest from Elea seems to be a god “Hermes”. In ancient Greek myths, Hermes was the son of Zeus and Maia, the messenger of Olimpian gods, a god of ways and boundaries, a god of sleep and dream, the guide of the dead , a patron of orators, traders, thieves, travellers and sheperds—the word Hermeneutic derives from the name of Hermes. The guest have been to Athens in the disguises of a statesman and sophist and mad philosopher. In the Statesman, he has examined young Socrates before Socrates to exercise his intelligence and virtues。But there are either circular orbtings, digressions, errors , repetitions, and even confusions in their speeches; and the guest has mixed logic distinctions with illustrative paradigms in his speechs about the statesman; and his exposition is both serious and humorous，including both solemn political instructions and rediculous satire. The guest not only values the being of the correct regime ruled by knowledge but also admits the mistakes which have occurred in the ordinary regimes. So he has found the necessity of legislation through “a second sailing” . The fundamental views of Plato’s guest then is as follows: political regime is divided into two sorts—correct and not correct regimes.The former is the only right regime, i.e. the original form；and the latter generally have three types—monarch, the rule of a few, and of many, and each one of these could be cut in two and be made six, all of which are set down as imitations of the right one, i.e. false images.Therefore,the political regime has been divided into seven, and the right regime must be seperated apart from the six as the seventh.What’s more, these regimes have different conditions and ranks, which are in turn kingship, aristocracy, law-biding democracy, lawless deomocracy, oligarchy, tyrany, as well as the devine right regime according to their ranging.In the end, the guest comes to the conclusion that the partners of all the rest regimes are the seditionaries, and being the patrons of the greatest images they are themselves of the same sort, and being the greatest imitators and greatest enchanters, they prove to be the sophists of sophists. As a matter of fact, they are the so-called statesmen who are composed mainly of the multitude of the rich and the entire people, namely the political multitude（300e）. So the guest has disposed of the rivals to the kings with much difficulties.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D0
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-03-16
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2012-05-04
  • dc.relation.relatedpublications
  • 目 录引 言... 1一、《政治家》的基本要素... 5（一）人物：苏格拉底、德奥多罗、客人、小苏格拉底... 6（二）地点：雅典城邦的体操馆... 7（三）时间：公元前399年的一天... 8（四）目的... 9（五）构成... 11二、作为影像的政体... 14（一）开场白（291a-c）... 16（二）普通的政体（291c-292a）... 18（三）正确的政体（292a-293e）... 20（四）插曲：无法的统治者的正确性（294a-297b）... 24（五）模仿的政体（297b-302b）... 30（六）退场白（303c-d）... 41三、结语... 43参考文献... 44致 谢... 49
回到顶部