论民事举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量

Judges’ Discretion in Time Limit of Production Evidence in China

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

法学院

作者:

梅丽君

导师:

赵泽君

导师单位:

法学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

其他

关键词:

举证时限;法官自由裁量;诉讼权利保障

摘要:

民事举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量,是法官对逾期举证法律后果进行选择的一种裁判行为。本文从现行民事诉讼法第65条及最高人民法院新司法解释的相关规定着手,立足于现状,分析举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的问题所在,并从比较法的视角研究借鉴其他国家的相关制度,以证据失权的要件为出发点,探讨如何规范我国举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量。本文除引言和结语外,正文分为四个部分。第一部分主要是提出问题,即分析民事举证时限制度中规范法官自由裁量的必要性。在简要界定举证时限制度和法官自由裁量的基础上,分析在举证时限制度中赋予法官自由裁量的意义,指出对该制度中法官自由裁量进行规范的必要性。第二部分主要是分析问题,包括文中的第二和第三部分,即分析我国和域外其他国家举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的现状。一是分析我国的立法现状和司法现状,并指出其在立法中和司法实践中存在的问题;二是对域外其他国家的相关规定进行介绍,并指出其对我国该制度设定的借鉴意义。第三部分主要是解决问题,即从制度完善方面来设想如何规范我国举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量。制度完善主要从三个方面推进:一是举证时限制度本身的进一步完善;二是相应配套制度的完善;三是对举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的监督。关键词:举证时限;法官自由裁量;诉讼权利保障;规制

参考文献:

56

学科:

诉讼法学

提交日期

2019-04-11

引用参考

梅丽君. 论民事举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量[D]. 西南政法大学,2015.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论民事举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量
  • dc.title
  • Judges’ Discretion in Time Limit of Production Evidence in China
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20130042021230
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 梅丽君
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2015
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 赵泽君
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 法学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 其他
  • dc.subject
  • 举证时限;法官自由裁量;诉讼权利保障
  • dc.subject
  • time limit of production evidence;discretion of the judge;civil rights protecting;regulation
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 民事举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量,是法官对逾期举证法律后果进行选择的一种裁判行为。本文从现行民事诉讼法第65条及最高人民法院新司法解释的相关规定着手,立足于现状,分析举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的问题所在,并从比较法的视角研究借鉴其他国家的相关制度,以证据失权的要件为出发点,探讨如何规范我国举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量。本文除引言和结语外,正文分为四个部分。第一部分主要是提出问题,即分析民事举证时限制度中规范法官自由裁量的必要性。在简要界定举证时限制度和法官自由裁量的基础上,分析在举证时限制度中赋予法官自由裁量的意义,指出对该制度中法官自由裁量进行规范的必要性。第二部分主要是分析问题,包括文中的第二和第三部分,即分析我国和域外其他国家举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的现状。一是分析我国的立法现状和司法现状,并指出其在立法中和司法实践中存在的问题;二是对域外其他国家的相关规定进行介绍,并指出其对我国该制度设定的借鉴意义。第三部分主要是解决问题,即从制度完善方面来设想如何规范我国举证时限制度中的法官自由裁量。制度完善主要从三个方面推进:一是举证时限制度本身的进一步完善;二是相应配套制度的完善;三是对举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的监督。关键词:举证时限;法官自由裁量;诉讼权利保障;规制
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Time Limit of production evidence in Civil Judges' Discretion is a judge on the freedom to choose the consequences of late proof.This article bases on the article sixty -five of the civil procedure law and the new judicial interpretation of the Supreme Court to proceed,bases on the current situation, analyses the problem in discretion of the judge in time limit of production evidence and learn from the relevant systems of other countries in the perspective of comparative law researchto lose the right elements of the evidence as a starting point to discuss how to regulate discretion of the judge in time limit of production evidence.Excluding the introduction and the conclusion, this article is divided into four parts.The first part is problem raising. It analyzes the necessity of regulating discretion of the judge in time limit of production evidence .After a brief definition of the time limit of production evidence and discretion of the judge ,based on the analysis gives judges discretion significance limit proof system, and points out that the system of the necessity of discretion standard. The second part is problem analyzing .It includes the second and third parts of the text, which analyzes the status of China's and other countries the time limit proof system of judicial discretion.First analyze the status of China's legislative and judicial situation, and pointed out the existence of judicial practice and in legislation issues; the second is related to the extraterritorial provisions are introduced in other countries, and pointed out that its reference to the system of the set.The third part is problem solving, Namely the institutional aspects to imagine how to regulate the perfect time proof system judges discretion.Institutional development in three main areas to promote: First, to further improve the system itself limit the burden of proof; second is to improve the appropriate supporting systems; third time system monitoring of evidence the judge discretion.Keywords: time limit of production evidence; discretion of the judge; civil rights protecting ;regulation
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2026-03-18
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2015-05-16
  • dc.relation.citedreferences
  • 56
  • dc.relation.relatedpublications
  • 引 言.................................................................................................................................... 1一、举证时限制度与法官自由裁量概述............................................................................ 2(一)举证时限制度概述..................................................................................................... 2(二)法官自由裁量概述..................................................................................................... 4(三)举证时限制度中赋予法官自由裁量的意义及对其规制的必要性......................... 6二、我国举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的现状及其存在的问题................................. 9(一)举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的现状..................................................................... 9(二)举证时限制度中法官自由裁量存在的问题........................................................... 13三、举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的域外考察及对我国的借鉴............................... 14(一)域外考察................................................................................................................... 14(二)域外相关制度对我国的借鉴................................................................................... 18四、对我国民事举证时限制度中法官自由裁量的规制................................................ 19(一)进一步完善举证时限制度....................................................................................... 20(二)完善相应的配套制度............................................................................................... 23(三)加强对法官自由裁量的监督................................................................................... 25结 语.................................................................................................................................. 28参考文献................................................................................................................................. 29致 谢.................................................................................................................................. 32
回到顶部