我国侦查程序的完善——以念斌案为例

Improvement of the investigation procedure- in terms of Nianbin case

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

刑事侦查学院

作者:

潘保安

导师:

罗永红

导师单位:

刑事侦查学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

其他

关键词:

侦查行为;侦查程序;缺陷;完善

摘要:

念斌案作为一起历经八年诉讼而终审被判决无罪的案件,成为2014年法律理论界与实务界重点关注的案件。一起中毒事件,由此引发了一件难以厘清的疑案。念斌前前后后长达八年的羁押,曾被四次判为死刑,因为各种证据存在明显的漏洞,远远不能达到确实、充分的程度,各证据之间也难以相互得以印证,最终被判决无罪释放。这起案件在很多地方值得我们总结与反思,特别是侦查程序中出现的问题与缺陷值得我们深思。本文除了引言与结语部分之外,前后分为四个部分:案件概况、侦查过程中存在问题的分析、侦查程序的反思、侦查程序的完善。通过这样的体例编排从侦查程序的视角对本案进行全面解读,对本案侦查程序中存在的问题进行深度解剖,并提出相关的完善思路。第一部分,主要介绍本案的来龙去脉。这部分着重介绍中毒事件发生的经过,以及立案、侦查、审查起诉、历次审判等诉讼过程。通过阐述本案刑事诉讼各阶段的不同流程,全方位地展示其基本情况。第二部分,阐述本案在侦查过程存在的突出问题。主要抓住本案中表现突出的刑讯逼供、违规鉴定、隐匿证据等问题进行深度分析,探索这些问题在司法实践中的引发原由、相关危害。同时,联系本案侦查的实际情况,分析它们对本案带来的影响。第三部分,是本案背后的深层次思考,对我国当前的侦查程序的缺陷进行深层次分析。先以侦查程序缺陷的基础性问题为导入,即我国侦查程序模式的分析;之后从五个方面分析我国侦查程序存在的缺陷及本案相应表现,即侦辩关系的失衡、侦查方式的僵化、检察监督的不足、司法审查的缺失、救济途径的不足等。第四部分,阐述我国侦查程序完善的路径与方向。提出相应措施,试图探索我国侦查程序完善的新路径。从思想观念、具体制度和司法实践三个层次进行思考,结合当前司法体制改革的方向,对侦查程序存在问题进行必要的回应与总结。

学科:

提交日期

2019-04-11

引用参考

潘保安. 我国侦查程序的完善——以念斌案为例[D]. ,2015.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 我国侦查程序的完善——以念斌案为例
  • dc.title
  • Improvement of the investigation procedure- in terms of Nianbin case
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20130012011107
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 潘保安
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 刑事侦查学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2015
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 罗永红
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 刑事侦查学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 其他
  • dc.subject
  • 侦查行为;侦查程序;缺陷;完善
  • dc.subject
  • investigatory behavior; investigatory procedure; defect; improvement
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 念斌案作为一起历经八年诉讼而终审被判决无罪的案件,成为2014年法律理论界与实务界重点关注的案件。一起中毒事件,由此引发了一件难以厘清的疑案。念斌前前后后长达八年的羁押,曾被四次判为死刑,因为各种证据存在明显的漏洞,远远不能达到确实、充分的程度,各证据之间也难以相互得以印证,最终被判决无罪释放。这起案件在很多地方值得我们总结与反思,特别是侦查程序中出现的问题与缺陷值得我们深思。本文除了引言与结语部分之外,前后分为四个部分:案件概况、侦查过程中存在问题的分析、侦查程序的反思、侦查程序的完善。通过这样的体例编排从侦查程序的视角对本案进行全面解读,对本案侦查程序中存在的问题进行深度解剖,并提出相关的完善思路。第一部分,主要介绍本案的来龙去脉。这部分着重介绍中毒事件发生的经过,以及立案、侦查、审查起诉、历次审判等诉讼过程。通过阐述本案刑事诉讼各阶段的不同流程,全方位地展示其基本情况。第二部分,阐述本案在侦查过程存在的突出问题。主要抓住本案中表现突出的刑讯逼供、违规鉴定、隐匿证据等问题进行深度分析,探索这些问题在司法实践中的引发原由、相关危害。同时,联系本案侦查的实际情况,分析它们对本案带来的影响。第三部分,是本案背后的深层次思考,对我国当前的侦查程序的缺陷进行深层次分析。先以侦查程序缺陷的基础性问题为导入,即我国侦查程序模式的分析;之后从五个方面分析我国侦查程序存在的缺陷及本案相应表现,即侦辩关系的失衡、侦查方式的僵化、检察监督的不足、司法审查的缺失、救济途径的不足等。第四部分,阐述我国侦查程序完善的路径与方向。提出相应措施,试图探索我国侦查程序完善的新路径。从思想观念、具体制度和司法实践三个层次进行思考,结合当前司法体制改革的方向,对侦查程序存在问题进行必要的回应与总结。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Nianbin case attracts a lot of publicity in the academic and practical field in the eight-year litigation, which eventually has been found non-guilty in 2014. A poisoning leads to a doubtful case. Nianbin, as a poisoning suspicion, has suffered eight years imprisonment and has been sentenced to death four times. However, Nianbin has been finally acquitted of a crime, because the evidence linkage obtains a legal loophole. Where a legal loophole exists, the evidence does not prove certainly and abundantly.This case deserves our reflection and conclusion in many places, especially problems and defects in the investigative procedure. In this paper, in addition to the introduction and epilogue, the content is divided into four parts: introduction of the case, analysis of problems in the investigation process, reflection on investigative procedures, and improvement of investigative procedures. Through this choreography, theauthor try to elaborate Nianbin case comprehensively from the perspective of the investigation, analyze in depth the problems on the investigation, and propose improvement ideas.The first part introduces all the ins and outs of the case. This part focuses on poisoning incidents, as well as filing, investigation, prosecution, trial and other proceedings previous. Theauthor try to demonstrate its basic situation, by describing the various stages of different processes in the criminal lawsuit.The second part expounds the outstanding problems existing in the investigation process. Theauthor try to conduct an in-depth analysis on such questions as torture, illegal identification, concealing evidence and other issues; to explore these issues in the judicial practice of initiation reasons related hazards. Meanwhile, connecting the actual situation in the investigation of the case, theauthor analyze their impact on the case brought.The third part is a deliberation on the case, with an in-depth analysis of a deficiency of the current investigation procedure. At first, theauthor conduct an analysis of the investigation procedure mode, with the introduction of the current defects on investigation. Then, analyze the defects and corresponding performance of the investigation procedure in this case from five aspects, namely the unbalanced relationship between investigation and debate, rigid way of investigation, short of monitoring of Public Prosecutions, lack of judicial reviews, inadequate reliefs and so on.The fourth part sets forth a sound path and direction of the investigation procedure. Propose appropriate measures and try to explore perfect solutions on the investigative procedure. Thepaper deliberate on three levels --- ideas, specific systems and judicial practice, problems of our investigative procedures necessary to respond to the summary, in combination with the current direction of the judicial system.
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2015-05-16
  • dc.relation.relatedpublications
  • 引 言................................................................... 1一、案件概况............................................................. 2二、本案侦查过程中存在问题的分析........................................ 4(一)刑讯逼供.......................................................... 4(二)违规鉴定.......................................................... 6(三)隐匿证据.......................................................... 9三、本案对侦查程序的反思............................................... 10(一)侦查程序模式解读................................................. 10(二)我国侦查程序存在的缺陷及本案表现................................. 13四、侦查程序的完善...................................................... 19(一)思想观念的更新................................................... 19(二)具体制度的完善................................................... 21(三)司法实践的提升................................................... 23结 语.................................................................. 26参考文献................................................................ 27后 记.................................................................. 30
回到顶部