论宗教裁判中法律因素的增长——以西班牙宗教裁判所为例

The Increase of Legal Factors in the Inquisition―― The Case of Spanish Inquisition

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属院系:

行政法学院

作者:

刘皓琦

导师:

杨天江

导师单位:

行政法学院

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

宗教裁判所;异端;审判机制;审判程序

摘要:

宗教裁判是指基督教会运用其内部的司法权力对异端、巫术等案件进行审理的制度。区别于世俗审判的这种裁判机制看似只针对教会内部,但是在中世纪基督教融汇于欧洲社会各个角落的情况下,宗教裁判的影响足以涵盖整个社会。作为教会进行司法审判所适用的机制,宗教裁判对于镇压异端、维护教会权威具有举足轻重的作用。本文的第一部分首先对异端的定义、内容进行简要介绍,然后从异端、教会、社会三个角度分析为何审判异端,探索宗教裁判的产生。其次,梳理了宗教裁判所设立、发展以及衰落的过程。从最初的混乱到制度化,宗教裁判的审理程序逐渐形成一套系统化的标准,立法活动的增多也为其提供专门的裁判依据,机构、人员的配置方面都逐渐完善。在宗教裁判所的历史进程中,裁判依据、审判程序以及证据等法律制度的变化都显示出审判朝着更理性化、制度化的方向发展。第二部分主要以西班牙宗教裁判所为代表,具体探究其设立目标、机构组织以及审判活动。在欧洲各地的宗教裁判已经兴盛的时期才建立的西班牙宗教裁判所,能够直接运用已经体系化的程序、规则,也能将其作用发挥到最大。与其他地方宗教裁判所不同的是西班牙宗教裁判所是主要针对犹太改宗者设立的,而且其更多处于世俗权力的管理之下,这些独特之处都是值得比较、研究的。第三部分主要对宗教裁判的运行机制进行较为系统的描述,具体内容包括案件审理的范围和适用的审判程序。宗教裁判中审理的主要是异端案件,在欧洲巫术盛行的时候,也审理大量的巫术案件。对于宗教裁判的审理程序,将对比罗马法的相关程序,从传讯、审判、判决以及惩罚措施几个方面进行论述,并梳理出从立案到判决作出以及执行惩罚的流程。文章的最后一部分大致分析了宗教裁判在辩护制度、证据制度以及诉讼程序等方面的价值及对现代法治的贡献。同时,发展过程中的曲折、沉重代价也不可忽略,希望这些能为现今的发展提供一些参考、反思。

提交日期

2020-06-25

引用参考

刘皓琦. 论宗教裁判中法律因素的增长——以西班牙宗教裁判所为例[D]. 西南政法大学,2020.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 论宗教裁判中法律因素的增长——以西班牙宗教裁判所为例
  • dc.title
  • The Increase of Legal Factors in the Inquisition―― The Case of Spanish Inquisition
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20180351021633
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 刘皓琦
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 行政法学院
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 法律硕士专业学位
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2020
  • dc.contributor.direction
  • 法理学
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 杨天江
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 行政法学院
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 宗教裁判所,异端,审判机制,审判程序
  • dc.subject
  • Inquisition,Heresy,Trial mechanism,Trial Procedure
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 宗教裁判是指基督教会运用其内部的司法权力对异端、巫术等案件进行审理的制度。区别于世俗审判的这种裁判机制看似只针对教会内部,但是在中世纪基督教融汇于欧洲社会各个角落的情况下,宗教裁判的影响足以涵盖整个社会。作为教会进行司法审判所适用的机制,宗教裁判对于镇压异端、维护教会权威具有举足轻重的作用。本文的第一部分首先对异端的定义、内容进行简要介绍,然后从异端、教会、社会三个角度分析为何审判异端,探索宗教裁判的产生。其次,梳理了宗教裁判所设立、发展以及衰落的过程。从最初的混乱到制度化,宗教裁判的审理程序逐渐形成一套系统化的标准,立法活动的增多也为其提供专门的裁判依据,机构、人员的配置方面都逐渐完善。在宗教裁判所的历史进程中,裁判依据、审判程序以及证据等法律制度的变化都显示出审判朝着更理性化、制度化的方向发展。第二部分主要以西班牙宗教裁判所为代表,具体探究其设立目标、机构组织以及审判活动。在欧洲各地的宗教裁判已经兴盛的时期才建立的西班牙宗教裁判所,能够直接运用已经体系化的程序、规则,也能将其作用发挥到最大。与其他地方宗教裁判所不同的是西班牙宗教裁判所是主要针对犹太改宗者设立的,而且其更多处于世俗权力的管理之下,这些独特之处都是值得比较、研究的。第三部分主要对宗教裁判的运行机制进行较为系统的描述,具体内容包括案件审理的范围和适用的审判程序。宗教裁判中审理的主要是异端案件,在欧洲巫术盛行的时候,也审理大量的巫术案件。对于宗教裁判的审理程序,将对比罗马法的相关程序,从传讯、审判、判决以及惩罚措施几个方面进行论述,并梳理出从立案到判决作出以及执行惩罚的流程。文章的最后一部分大致分析了宗教裁判在辩护制度、证据制度以及诉讼程序等方面的价值及对现代法治的贡献。同时,发展过程中的曲折、沉重代价也不可忽略,希望这些能为现今的发展提供一些参考、反思。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • Inquisition refers to the system in which the Christian church uses its internal judicial power to try cases of heresy and witchcraft. Different from the secular judgment, this judgment mechanism seems to be only aimed at the church, but in the case of the integration of Christianity in all corners of European society in the middle ages, the influence of the inquisition was enough to cover the whole society. As an applicable mechanism for the judicial trial of the church, the inquisition plays an important role in suppressing heresy and maintaining the authority of the church.The first part of this paper firstly introduces the definition and content of heresy, and then analyzes why to judge heresy from the three perspectives of heresy, church and society, and explores the emergence of the inquisition. Secondly, this part sorts out the process of the establishment, development and decline of the inquisition. From the initial confusion to institutionalization, the inquisition procedure gradually formed a set of systematic standards, and the increase of legislative activities also provided a special basis for the inquisition, and the allocation of institutions and personnel was gradually improved. In the course of the history of the inquisition, the changes of the legal system such as the basis of the inquisition, the procedure of the trial and the evidence all show that the trial is developing towards a more rational and institutionalized direction.The second part mainly takes the representative of the Spanish inquisition as the representative, and specifically explores its establishment of goals, organization and judicial activities.The Spanish inquisition, which was established at a time when the inquisition was already flourishing throughout Europe, was able to apply directly the procedures and rules that had been systematized and to maximize their role. Different from other inquisition in other places, the inquisition in Spain was mainly set up for Jewish proselytes, and it was more under the control of secular power. These unique features are worth comparing and studying.The third part describes the operating mechanism of the inquisition systematically, including the scope of the trial and the trial procedure. The inquisition dealt mainly with cases of heresy, and also with a large number of witchcraft cases when witchcraft was prevalent in Europe.The inquisition procedure of the inquisition will be discussed from the aspects of subpoena, interrogation, judgment and punishment measures by comparing the relevant procedures of Roman law, and will summarize the process from filing the case to making the judgment and executing the punishment.The last part of the article roughly analyzes the value of the inquisition in defense system, evidence system and litigation procedure and its contribution to the modern rule of law.At the same time, the twists and turns in the development process and the costs can not be ignored, I hope these can provide some reference and reflection for today's development
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2020-06-20
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2020-06-06
回到顶部