职务犯罪监察调查中的从宽处罚建议制度研究

Study on the Propositional System of Lenient Punishment in Duty—related Crime Supervisory Investigation

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

潘金贵

归属院系：

法学院

作者：

潘金贵1 ;王霑

摘要：

从宽处罚建议制度是融合了实体规范与程序规范、兼顾了监察调查和刑事司法的综合性法律制度,具有巩固发展反腐败斗争压倒性胜利,实现纪法衔接、法法衔接等价值。对该制度的概括性规定是立法技术的有意为之,却给制度适用造成阻滞。从宽处罚建议具有影响后续量刑建议和司法判决的能力,但有赖于司法机关的全面审查和诉讼支持。监察机关是否提出从宽处罚建议取决于对案件整体情况的综合考量,可以采取从宽处罚建议书或者在起诉意见书中专列项的方式向司法机关提出从宽处罚建议。该制度设置的两个严格的审批程序可以弥补律师不能介入的缺憾。应当建立认罪越早从宽越多的激励机制和阶梯式量刑减让机制。

出版日期：

2021-01-16

学科：

诉讼法学; 宪法学与行政法学

收录：

CSSCI

提交日期：

2021-03-01

引用参考：

潘金贵;王霑. 职务犯罪监察调查中的从宽处罚建议制度研究[J]. 重庆社会科学,2021(01):101-115.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 职务犯罪监察调查中的从宽处罚建议制度研究
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 潘金贵;王霑
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Pan Jingui;Wang Zhan;Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 重庆社会科学
  • dc.publisher
  • Chongqing Social Sciences
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.314
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 101-115
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-01-16
  • dc.subject
  • 职务犯罪;监察调查;从宽处罚;认罪认罚
  • dc.subject
  • duty—related crime;supervisory investigation;proposal for lenient punishment;admission of guilt and acceptance of punishment
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 从宽处罚建议制度是融合了实体规范与程序规范、兼顾了监察调查和刑事司法的综合性法律制度,具有巩固发展反腐败斗争压倒性胜利,实现纪法衔接、法法衔接等价值。对该制度的概括性规定是立法技术的有意为之,却给制度适用造成阻滞。从宽处罚建议具有影响后续量刑建议和司法判决的能力,但有赖于司法机关的全面审查和诉讼支持。监察机关是否提出从宽处罚建议取决于对案件整体情况的综合考量,可以采取从宽处罚建议书或者在起诉意见书中专列项的方式向司法机关提出从宽处罚建议。该制度设置的两个严格的审批程序可以弥补律师不能介入的缺憾。应当建立认罪越早从宽越多的激励机制和阶梯式量刑减让机制。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • the propositional system of lenient punishment is a comprehensive legal system that integrates criminal substantive law and procedural law,crosses supervision and criminal justice fields. It has the value of consolidating the overwhelming trend of fighting against corruption and realizing the linkage between discipline and law,or between law and law. The general provisions of the system are intended by the legislative technology, but they block the application of the system. The proposal of leniency punishment has the ability to affect the subsequent sentencing proposal and judicial decisions, but still need the comprehensive review of the judicial organs. The supervisory organ shall make a decision on whether to propose lenient punishment after comprehensive consideration, and can only make vague proposal, and transfer them to the judicial organ in the form of proposal on lenient punishment or proposal on prosecution. The two strict examination and approval procedures set up by the system can make up for the lack of lawyers' intervention. The incentive mechanism of the earlier admission of guilt, the more lenient and the step-type sentencing reduction mechanism should be established.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • GJ2019C30
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 最高人民检察院检察理论课题“认罪认罚后被告人反悔研究”（GJ2019C30）
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 50-1168/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1673-0186
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.559
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.2;D922.11
回到顶部