网络平台独家交易的违法性分析

Analysis on Illegality of the Network Platform Exclusive Trading

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

杨文明

作者:

杨文明1

摘要:

网络平台"二选一"行为引发了系列讼争,焦点在于独家交易违法性判断。按照逻辑,平台独家交易违法性分析应以契合网络经济规律的法律标准为指引,以竞争损害为证成条件,以正当理由为阻却要件。违法性得证与否最终落脚于竞争损害与正当理由的平衡分析。相比产出和价格,市场的可参与性、可竞争性以及平台的可选择性对消费者更为重要。依此标准观之,独家交易提高了平台竞争对手的成本,导致市场封锁并损害用户自由选择权利。当然,独家交易也能够激发网络效应、生成自然垄断,且有助于防止竞争对手"搭便车"。如竞争损害和正当理由兼而有之,仍需以较小限制替代测试确定违法与否。

出版日期:

2021-07-15

学科:

法学

收录:

北大核心期刊; CSSCI; 中国科技核心期刊

提交日期

2021-09-16

引用参考

杨文明. 网络平台独家交易的违法性分析[J]. 现代法学,2021(04):156-167.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 网络平台独家交易的违法性分析
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 杨文明
  • dc.contributor.author
  • YANG Wen-ming;Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.publisher
  • 现代法学
  • dc.publisher
  • Modern Law Science
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 04
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.43;No.236
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 156-167
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-07-15
  • dc.subject
  • 网络平台;独家交易;违法性;正当理由;较小限制替代
  • dc.subject
  • network platform;exclusive trading;illegality;justification;less restrictive alternative
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 网络平台"二选一"行为引发了系列讼争,焦点在于独家交易违法性判断。按照逻辑,平台独家交易违法性分析应以契合网络经济规律的法律标准为指引,以竞争损害为证成条件,以正当理由为阻却要件。违法性得证与否最终落脚于竞争损害与正当理由的平衡分析。相比产出和价格,市场的可参与性、可竞争性以及平台的可选择性对消费者更为重要。依此标准观之,独家交易提高了平台竞争对手的成本,导致市场封锁并损害用户自由选择权利。当然,独家交易也能够激发网络效应、生成自然垄断,且有助于防止竞争对手"搭便车"。如竞争损害和正当理由兼而有之,仍需以较小限制替代测试确定违法与否。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • A series of litigation triggered by the"either-or choice"of network platform focused on the illegality of exclusive trading. The analysis of the illegality of network platform exclusive trading should be guided by legal standards that conform to the objective law of the network economy. The illegality can be demonstrated by competition injury. The undertakings can also take justification as the cause of illegality deterrence. Whether the illegality is proven or not ultimately depends on the balance analysis of competition injury and justification. Specifically,the participability,contestability of relevant market,and platform selectivity are more important to consumers than output and price. According to this standard,exclusive trading will raise rivals' costs,lead to market blockages and restrict users' freedom of choice. However,exclusive trading can also stimulate network effects,generate natural monopolies,and prevent competitors from free-riding. Where both competition injury and justification are involved,it is still necessary to substitute a test of less restrictive alternative to determine whether exclusive trading is illegal or not.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 18CFX024;17YJC820059
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 国家社科基金青年项目“公私合作背景下的网络平台规制研究”(18CFX024);教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“互联网违法信息的私人规制研究”(17YJC820059)
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 50-1020/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1001-2397
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 2.595
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D922.294
回到顶部