我国民事诉权司法保障的实证考察与完善路径

The Empirical Investigation and Improvement Path of Judicial Protection of Civil Litigation Rights in China

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

李燕

作者:

李燕1 ;胡月

摘要:

我国人权司法保障存在重刑轻民的现象,但民事诉讼关乎民众最为广泛且迫切的人权救济需求。民事诉权作为民事诉讼程序运行的逻辑起点和核心,既具有重要的实体性人权保障功能,又是独立的程序性人权。因此,本文将民事诉权作为研究民事诉讼领域人权保障的重点,在对法官和律师进行抽样问卷调查的基础上,对我国民事司法中的诉权实践作了实证分析,并提出以民事诉权行使环节为主线,构建全方位的诉权保障机制,从而实现诉权对人权的制度化保障作用,促进我国人权司法保障体系的均衡发展。具体可从三个维度推进:一是在立案程序中坚持诉权启动的自由与平等,消除影响立案的人为阻碍,畅通弱势群体接近司法的渠道;二是在审判程序中确保诉权行使的充分性与对审判权的制衡,尊重当事人的意志表达和权利处分,注重双方当事人的平等保障;三是在审判监督程序中推进诉权救济的落实与完善,明确检察监督对诉权救济的边界,提升诉权救济的全面性和精准性。

出版日期:

2021-09-10

学科:

法学; 政治学

收录:

CSSCI

提交日期

2022-01-20

引用参考

李燕;胡月. 我国民事诉权司法保障的实证考察与完善路径[J]. 人权,2021(05):91-109.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 我国民事诉权司法保障的实证考察与完善路径
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 李燕;胡月
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Li Yan;Hu Yue
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学民商法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 人权
  • dc.publisher
  • Human Rights
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 05
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.119
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 91-109
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-09-10
  • dc.subject
  • 人权司法保障;民事诉权;诉权自由平等;诉权制衡;诉权救济
  • dc.subject
  • Civil Litigation Rights;Freedom and Equality of Litigation Rights;Checks and Balances of Litigation Rights;Relief of Litigation Rights
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 我国人权司法保障存在重刑轻民的现象,但民事诉讼关乎民众最为广泛且迫切的人权救济需求。民事诉权作为民事诉讼程序运行的逻辑起点和核心,既具有重要的实体性人权保障功能,又是独立的程序性人权。因此,本文将民事诉权作为研究民事诉讼领域人权保障的重点,在对法官和律师进行抽样问卷调查的基础上,对我国民事司法中的诉权实践作了实证分析,并提出以民事诉权行使环节为主线,构建全方位的诉权保障机制,从而实现诉权对人权的制度化保障作用,促进我国人权司法保障体系的均衡发展。具体可从三个维度推进:一是在立案程序中坚持诉权启动的自由与平等,消除影响立案的人为阻碍,畅通弱势群体接近司法的渠道;二是在审判程序中确保诉权行使的充分性与对审判权的制衡,尊重当事人的意志表达和权利处分,注重双方当事人的平等保障;三是在审判监督程序中推进诉权救济的落实与完善,明确检察监督对诉权救济的边界,提升诉权救济的全面性和精准性。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The close coupling of civil litigation rights and human rights means how well litigation rights are realized would directly or indirectly affect the judicial protection of human rights.Therefore, human rights protection in the field of civil litigation should take the right of civil litigation as the starting point and core.Based on a sample questionnaire survey of judges and lawyers, this paper conducts an empirical analysis and proposes that the exercise of this right should be taken as the main line to build a comprehensive protection mechanism for this right to realize its role in providing institutional guarantee for human rights protection.It proceeds from three dimensions: first, the process of filing a case should uphold the freedom and equality of the right to initiate litigation, remove substantial obstacles that affect the filing of the case, and ensure access to justice for disadvantaged groups; second, the trial procedure strengthens the checks and balances of the right of litigation against the judicial power, and respects the procedural subject status of the two parties to realize equal protection of both parties; the third is to promote the implementation and improvement of relief for this right in the supervisory procedure, clarify the boundary of its relief by the procuratorial supervision, and enhance the comprehensiveness and accuracy of the relief.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 201919JJD820014
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 2019年度教育部高校人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“司法制度与人权保障——以民事司法改革诉权保护为样本的研究”(19JJD820014)阶段性成果
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 11-4090/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1009-6442
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0.148
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D925.1
回到顶部