违约责任领域中的容忍义务问题研究

Research on the Duty of Tolerance in the Field of Liability for Breach of Contract

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

陈亮

归属院系：

人工智能法学院（应用法学院）

作者：

刘文青 ; 陈亮1,2

摘要：

容忍义务对于整个民法而言具有特殊的作用。容忍义务的定性围绕着广泛性这一关键特征进行,其法理基础、性质及适用范围实际上均应作广义理解,而非将其来源及范畴局限于相邻权等传统领域、性质限于不作为这一分支。容忍义务的各项内涵扩张使得违约责任领域存在容忍义务具有法理上的支撑,除此之外,容忍义务与违约责任的生成及追责过程也存在着本质的关联,如果说容忍义务是相邻关系的核心,那么容忍义务便是违约责任的支撑,使得违约责任的界定与处理更为分明与有力。由于容忍义务的功能在于合理区分违约责任承担的方式及程度,因此划分容忍义务与违约责任之间的边界并提出容忍义务的限度标准是必要的,可以利益平衡为突破点,并辅以主观标准、基本原则等建立起容忍义务的综合性标准。基于容忍义务的广义理解,其限度标准也可以适用于民法其他分支领域。

出版日期：

2021-12-31

学科：

法学

提交日期：

2022-03-31

引用参考：

刘文青;陈亮. 违约责任领域中的容忍义务问题研究[J]. 应用法学评论,2021(01):270-283.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 违约责任领域中的容忍义务问题研究
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 刘文青;陈亮
  • dc.contributor.author
  • Liu Wenqing;Chen Liang;School of Artificial Intelligence and Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学人工智能法学院;西南政法大学最高人民法院应用法学研究基地
  • dc.publisher
  • 应用法学评论
  • dc.publisher
  • Applied Law Review
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2021
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 270-283
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2021-12-31
  • dc.subject
  • 容忍义务;违约责任;限度标准
  • dc.subject
  • Tolerance obligation;Liability for breach of contract;Limit standard
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 容忍义务对于整个民法而言具有特殊的作用。容忍义务的定性围绕着广泛性这一关键特征进行,其法理基础、性质及适用范围实际上均应作广义理解,而非将其来源及范畴局限于相邻权等传统领域、性质限于不作为这一分支。容忍义务的各项内涵扩张使得违约责任领域存在容忍义务具有法理上的支撑,除此之外,容忍义务与违约责任的生成及追责过程也存在着本质的关联,如果说容忍义务是相邻关系的核心,那么容忍义务便是违约责任的支撑,使得违约责任的界定与处理更为分明与有力。由于容忍义务的功能在于合理区分违约责任承担的方式及程度,因此划分容忍义务与违约责任之间的边界并提出容忍义务的限度标准是必要的,可以利益平衡为突破点,并辅以主观标准、基本原则等建立起容忍义务的综合性标准。基于容忍义务的广义理解,其限度标准也可以适用于民法其他分支领域。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The duty of tolerance has a special effect on the civil law as a whole.The qualitative nature of the obligation of tolerance revolves around the key feature of extensiveness.In fact,its legal basis,nature,and scope of application should be understood in a broad sense,instead of limiting its source and scope to traditional fields such as neighboring rights,and its nature is limited to inaction.A branch.The expansion of the various connotations of the duty of tolerance makes the existence of the duty of tolerance in the field of liability for breach of contract legally supported.In addition,the duty of tolerance is essentially related to the generation and accountability process of the liability for breach of contract.If the duty of tolerance is an adjacent relationship At the core,the duty of tolerance is the support of the liability for breach of contract,which makes the definition and handling of liability for breach of contract more clear and powerful.Since the function of the duty of tolerance is to reasonably distinguish the way and degree of the responsibility for breach of contract,it is necessary to divide the boundary between the duty of tolerance and the liability for breach of contract and propose the limit standard of the duty of tolerance.The balance of interests can be the breakthrough point,supplemented by subjective standards,basic principles,etc.to establish comprehensive standards for tolerance obligations.Based on the broad understanding of the duty of tolerance,its limit standard can also be applied to other branches of civil law.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 20202020SWZX-YJ02
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 西南政法大学2020年度创新创业训练计划法律实务前沿专项项目“容忍义务及其与违约责任承担的边界与适用问题研究”(项目编号:2020SWZX-YJ02)
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D913
回到顶部