公司法程序规范优化的逻辑转向

The Logical Turn in Optimizing the Procedural Norms of the Company Law

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者:

林少伟

作者:

林少伟1,2

摘要:

重实体轻程序的传统理念,导致我国公司法程序规范出现诸多偏失,进而引发股东权利弱化、董事行权无序以及监督机制落空等公司内部弊端,以及诱生交易安全不确定性与社会责任承担模糊化等公司外部弊端。故应重塑公司法程序规范的价值功能定位,要认识到程序规范不仅是公司法第二次现代化的必经之路,也是公司意思独立的必要保障,其不仅能及时纠正公司内部主体利益异质化趋向,也能适时回应智能科技革命的发展。在新一轮公司法修订背景下,优化公司法程序规范应在基本逻辑遵循上有所突破,在定位逻辑上由工具论转向本位论,在价值逻辑上由内部治理转向体系治理,在场域逻辑上由管制-自治单极化转向菜单式选择,在肇始逻辑上由外植程序转向内生程序,以及在目的逻辑上由被动反应转向前瞻预防,进而制定出一部“通情达理”的本土化公司法。

语种:

中文

出版日期:

2023-01-25

学科:

法学

收录:

北大核心期刊; CSSCI

提交日期

2023-03-27

引用参考

林少伟. 公司法程序规范优化的逻辑转向[J]. 南京师大学报(社会科学版),2023(01):124-134.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 公司法程序规范优化的逻辑转向
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 林少伟
  • dc.contributor.author
  • LIN Shaowei;School of Civil and Commercial Law, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学民商法学院;西南政法大学公司治理法律研究中心
  • dc.publisher
  • 南京师大学报(社会科学版)
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2023
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 01
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • No.245
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 124-134
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2023-01-25
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 公司法修订;程序规范;股东权利;公司自治;公司法本土化
  • dc.subject
  • revision of the company law;procedural norms;shareholders' rights;corporate autonomy;localization of company law
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 重实体轻程序的传统理念,导致我国公司法程序规范出现诸多偏失,进而引发股东权利弱化、董事行权无序以及监督机制落空等公司内部弊端,以及诱生交易安全不确定性与社会责任承担模糊化等公司外部弊端。故应重塑公司法程序规范的价值功能定位,要认识到程序规范不仅是公司法第二次现代化的必经之路,也是公司意思独立的必要保障,其不仅能及时纠正公司内部主体利益异质化趋向,也能适时回应智能科技革命的发展。在新一轮公司法修订背景下,优化公司法程序规范应在基本逻辑遵循上有所突破,在定位逻辑上由工具论转向本位论,在价值逻辑上由内部治理转向体系治理,在场域逻辑上由管制-自治单极化转向菜单式选择,在肇始逻辑上由外植程序转向内生程序,以及在目的逻辑上由被动反应转向前瞻预防,进而制定出一部“通情达理”的本土化公司法。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The traditional idea of stressing substance and despising procedure leads to many deviations in the procedural norm of the Company Law, which triggers the internal drawbacks, such as the weakening of shareholders' right, the disorderly exercise of power by the directors and the failure of supervision mechanism; as well as the external drawbacks, such as the uncertainty of transaction safety and the vagueness of social responsibility. Therefore, we should reshape the value and function orientation of procedural standards of the Company Law, and realize that procedural standards are not only the inevitable path to the second modernization of the Company Law, but also the necessary guarantee for the independent will of the corporations. Procedural norms can not only correct the heterogeneity of interests among the corporations, but also respond to the development of intelligent technology revolution in a timely manner. Against the background of the new revision of the Company Law, the optimization of the procedural norms of the Company Law should have a breakthrough in the following basic logics: in terms of positioning logic, it should be transformed from instrumentalism to departmentalism; in terms of value logic, it should be transformed from internal governance to system governance; in terms of field logic, it should be transformed from regulation-autonomy unipolarity to menu selection; in terms of initiating logic, it should be transformed from external program to endogenous program; and in terms of goal logic, it should be transformed from passive response to proactive prevention. As a result, the reasonable and localized company law could be formulated.
  • dc.description.sponsorshipPCode
  • 21BFX097
  • dc.description.sponsorship
  • 国家社科基金项目“公司法程序规范优化路径研究”(21BFX097)的阶段性成果
  • dc.description.sponsorshipsource
  • 国家社会科学基金
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 32-1030/C
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 1001-4608
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 1.525
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • D922.291.91
回到顶部