非医学原因生育力保存的伦理与法律分析

Ethical and Legal Analysis of Fertility Preservation for Non-Medical Reasons

成果信息
DC信息
传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

归属学者：

周燕

归属院系：

政治与公共管理学院 ; 经济法学院（生态法学院）

作者：

周燕1 ;蒋其星

摘要：

当前，非医学原因生育力保存的理论争议较大，且各国态度不一，我国对非医学原因生育力保存持严格谨慎的态度，主要是基于非医学原因生育力保存存在安全、伦理和法律风险。为顺应时代的发展趋势和引导医学技术的健康发展，在伦理层面，应理性看待非医学原因生育力保存技术的应用问题，确立我国非医学原因生育力保存的研究与应用的伦理原则，并加强非医学原因生育力保存技术的伦理风险审查；在法律层面，有必要及时采取立法规制措施，加强对医疗机构技术应用监管，限制生育力保存者的使用范围，以及明确相关主体的法律责任。

语种：

中文

出版日期：

2023-03-05

学科：

哲学; 法学

提交日期：

2023-04-19

引用参考：

周燕;蒋其星. 非医学原因生育力保存的伦理与法律分析[J]. 人权法学,2023(02):15-28+139-140.

全文附件授权许可：

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 非医学原因生育力保存的伦理与法律分析
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 周燕;蒋其星
  • dc.contributor.author
  • ZHOU Yan;JIANG Qixing;School of Politics and Public Administration, Southwest University of Political Science and Law;Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 西南政法大学政治与公共管理学院;西南政法大学经济法学院
  • dc.publisher
  • 人权法学
  • dc.publisher
  • Journal of Human Rights Law
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2023
  • dc.identifier.issue
  • 02
  • dc.identifier.volume
  • v.2;No.8
  • dc.identifier.page
  • 15-28+139-140
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2023-03-05
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 非医学原因;生育力保存;伦理风险;法律风险
  • dc.subject
  • non-medical reasons;fertility preservation;ethical risks;legal risks
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 当前，非医学原因生育力保存的理论争议较大，且各国态度不一，我国对非医学原因生育力保存持严格谨慎的态度，主要是基于非医学原因生育力保存存在安全、伦理和法律风险。为顺应时代的发展趋势和引导医学技术的健康发展，在伦理层面，应理性看待非医学原因生育力保存技术的应用问题，确立我国非医学原因生育力保存的研究与应用的伦理原则，并加强非医学原因生育力保存技术的伦理风险审查；在法律层面，有必要及时采取立法规制措施，加强对医疗机构技术应用监管，限制生育力保存者的使用范围，以及明确相关主体的法律责任。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The range of infertility patients is expanding in the context of modern life,which is fast-paced,high-intensity,high-stress,and high-pollution.The infertility rate in China has climbed to about 12%-18%.As the infertility rate among couples of childbearing age in China continues to rise,the demand for assisted reproductive technologies,such as fertility preservation for non-medical reasons,is also increasing.In China,fertility preservation techniques are strictly limited for non-medical reasons,such as the need to meet specific fertility preservation indications and the explicit prohibition of egg freezing for single women.This is because there are technical safety,ethical and legal risks associated with fertility preservation for nonmedical reasons.The technical safety risks are mainly due to the immaturity of the technology,which puts the egg freezer and the offspring born from frozen eggs at risk;the ethical risks are contrary to the ethical principle of "do no harm," "protection of future generations",and "social welfare",and impact on traditional family ethics,induce surrogacy,etc.The legal risks are mainly related to the disputes on protecting children's rights and interests,women's reproductive rights,and marital autonomy.Although the support for fertility preservation for non-medical reasons varies from country to country,the technical development of fertility preservation for non-medical reasons and its legislative regulation are international trends that need to be addressed and responded to in China,even with a more forward-looking perspective.After analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of fertility preservation for non-medical reasons,this paper proposes recommendations for the future development of fertility preservation technology for non-medical reasons in China:at the ethical level,society should be rational and formalize the application of fertility preservation technology for non-medical reasons,establish ethical principles for the research and application of fertility preservation for non-medical reasons in China,and strengthen the ethical risk review of fertility preservation technology for non-medical reasons in China;At the law level,it is necessary to clarify the legislative system promptly,to strengthen the supervision of technology application in medical institutions,to limit the scope of use by owners as well as to clarify the legal duties of relevant subjects.
  • dc.identifier.CN
  • 50-1222/D
  • dc.identifier.issn
  • 2097-0749
  • dc.identifier.if
  • 0
  • dc.subject.discipline
  • B82-057;D923;D922.16
回到顶部