自愿型环境规制对企业融资约束的影响研究

Research on the impact of voluntary environmental regulation on corporate financing constraints

传播影响力
本库下载频次:
本库浏览频次:
CNKI下载频次:0

作者:

张媛淋

导师:

陈屹立

导师单位:

经济学院(数字经济学院)

学位:

硕士

语种:

中文

关键词:

自愿型环境规制;融资约束;信息不对称;经营风险;声誉

摘要:

党的二十大报告指出,推动经济社会发展绿色化、低碳化是实现高质量发展的关键环节,实现碳达峰、碳中和是一场广泛而深刻的经济社会系统性变革。这对绿色发展理念,绿色低碳的生产方式和生活方式提出了更高要求。随着企业环保实践的不断发展,自愿型环境规制成为继命令控制型环境规制和市场型环境规制后一种新型的环境规制工具。在全球气候危机加剧与“双碳”战略纵深推进的背景下,自愿型环境规制工具作为政府规制体系的重要补充,正通过企业在资源消耗和环境保护方面的自愿行动重塑市场运行逻辑。与此同时,不容忽视的是,企业的环保问题已经传导至资本市场,影响着外部利益相关者对企业的投资倾向,进一步表现为企业的融资问题。而资金融通的受限又阻碍着企业的绿色转型,影响国家产业结构优化升级。因此,参与自愿型环境规制能否对企业的融资约束产生影响?如果可以,其作用机制又是什么?厘清并回答这些问题是有意义且必要的。 为达到研究目的,本文做了如下努力:首先,在对国内外文献研读及梳理的基础上,分析阐述了环境规制的概念、内涵,对主流的环境规制类型进行归纳总结,并对自愿型环境规制的内外部动因及对企业绩效的影响做了较为详细且充分的展示,对融资约束领域相关研究以及融资约束和自愿型环境规制二者关系的文献做了系统归纳。其次,结合相关理论进行理论推演,提出研究假说。再次,本文以2010—2022年中国沪深A股上市公司作为研究样本,实证检验参与自愿型环境规制对企业融资约束的影响,同时对基准回归进行稳健性检验,并进一步从企业、地区和市场层面进行异质性探讨。紧接着,实证检验参与自愿型环境规制对企业融资约束可能存在的影响渠道。最后得出研究结论,并联系实际多角度提出相关的政策建议和管理启示。 本文的研究结果表明:(1)参与自愿型环境规制对缓解企业融资约束发挥着积极的作用;(2)机制分析结果表明,企业参与自愿型环境规制可以通过降低信息不对称、降低经营风险、提高声誉三方面作用于融资约束的缓解;(3)异质性分析结果表明,参与自愿型环境规制可能对非国有企业、非重污染企业、位于市场化程度高的地区的企业、处于成长期或成熟期的企业在缓解融资约束上的效果更加明显。 最后,结合实证研究结果,本文从政府、社会和企业三方提出了相应的针对性建议,以更好激发企业参与自愿型环境规制的主动性和积极性,推动整个社会的可持续化发展:(1)政府要扮演好引导员、管理员和监督员的角色,多举措将融资约束转化为拉动企业参与自愿型环境规制的内生动力;(2)社会主体,比如大众传媒要做好环保文化的传播者和环保事实的揭露者,投资者做好企业环境治理的资金激励者,消费者做好企业环境治理的产品投票者;(3)企业要做环境治理的坚守者,树立长期主义,提高环保意识,主动提升绿色实践的能动性,强化自身环保责任。

参考文献:

一、中文参考文献1.白俊红、芮静,环境规制、经济增长目标管理与中国经济高质量发展,宏观质量研究,2023(03),32-47。2.步晓宁、赵丽华,自愿性环境规制与企业污染排放——基于政府节能采购政策的实证检验,财经研究,2022(04),49-63。3.曾珍香、张早春、王梦雅,企业社会责任表现、报告质量与企业声誉——基于中国上市公司的实证研究,工业技术经济,2017(06),87-95。4.陈洪涛、束雯、王双英,公司治理结构、财务特征对环境信息披露影响的实证研究,南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2017(02),1-9。5.陈若鸿、赵雪延、金华,企业ESG表现对其融资成本的影响,科学决策,2022(11),24-40。6.陈艳莹、平靓,环境管理体系认证的出口贸易效应——基于包含多边阻力项引力模型的实证研究,世界经济研究,2017(07),99-109+121+137。7.成德宁、韦锦辉,不同类型环境规制影响我国产业竞争力的效应分析,广东财经大学学报,2019(03),26-33。8.杜兴强、殷敬伟、张颖等,国际化董事会与企业环境绩效,会计研究,2021(10),84-96。9.冯丽艳、肖翔、张靖,企业社会责任影响债务违约风险的内在机制——基于经营能力和经营风险的中介传导效应分析,华东经济管理,2016(04),140-148。10.傅京燕、李丽莎,环境规制、要素禀赋与产业国际竞争力的实证研究——基于中国制造业的面板数据,管理世界,2010(10),87-98+187。11.高凡雅、田高良、王喜,中小企业履行社会责任能缓解融资约束吗?科学学与科学技术管理,2017(06),133-143。12.高宏霞、朱海燕、孟樊俊,环境信息披露质量影响债务融资成本吗?——来自我国环境敏感型行业上市公司的经验证据,南京审计大学学报,2018(06),20-28。13.高明、陈巧辉,不同类型环境规制对产业升级的影响,工业技术经济,2019(01),91-99。14.关海玲、屈田雨,环境规制对产业结构升级的影响——基于中国284个地级市的经验证据,经济问题,2023(07),29-37。15.管宏友、毕春伟,环境管理中信息不对称问题研究,资源与产业,2010(03),137-14216.郭进、徐盈之,公众参与环境治理的逻辑、路径与效应,资源科学,2020(07),1372-1383。17.郭景先、巩文杰,企业ESG表现对债务违约风险的影响——基于企业生命周期理论视角,金融与经济,2023(11),21-30+45。18.郭玲玲、石玮,环境成本与企业绩效关系:来自重污染行业上市公司的证据,管理学刊,2022(02),87-102。19.郭庆宾、刘琪、张冰倩,不同类型环境规制对国际R&D溢出效应的影响比较研究,以长江经济带为例,长江流域资源与环境,2017(11),1752-1760。 20.韩纪琴、夏梦,环境规制对产业竞争力影响的研究——基于江苏制造业数据的分析,价格理论与实践,2018(08),135-138。21.何兴邦,环境规制与中国经济增长质量——基于省际面板数据的实证分析,当代经济科学,2018(02),1-10+124。22.侯超惠、张浩,ESG评价对企业融资约束的影响研究,中国集体经济,2024(08),70-73。23.胡湉湉、纪莉,环境报道的责任建构探究——兼论中国式现代化背景下媒体对公众环境参与的影响,天府新论,2023(05),131-139。24.胡元林、崔丹,企业环保投资影响因素的实证研究,生态经济,2019(01),161-166。25.花拥军、王冰、李庆,企业社会责任、经济政策不确定性与融资约束——基于社会责任“累积-保险”效应的研究视角,南方经济,2020(11),116-131。26.黄佳,公司治理、持续经营审计意见与企业债务融资成本,财会通讯,2019(24),33-36+57。27.黄新华.从干预型政府到规制型政府——建构面向国家治理现代化的政府与市场关系[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(03):78-88。28.江艇,因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应,中国工业经济,2022(05),100-120。29.靳小翠,企业文化会影响企业社会责任吗?——来自中国沪市上市公司的经验证据,会计研究,2017(02),56-62+97。30.黎文靖、路晓燕,机构投资者关注企业的环境绩效吗?——来自我国重污染行业上市公司的经验证据,金融研究,2015(12),97-112。31.李虹、张希源,管理层能力与企业环境责任关系研究——基于模仿压力和强制压力调节作用视角,华东经济管理,2016(08),139-146。32.李思慧,环境规制与城市绿色创新:助力抑或阻力?现代经济探讨,2023(02),94-104。33.李万利、陈亮、袁凯彬,互联网能否增强传统媒体的外部治理功能?——基于媒体环境报道与企业绿色创新视角,南开管理评论,2023,1-26。34.李晓英,FDI、环境规制与产业结构优化——基于空间计量模型的实证,当代经济科学,2018(02),104-113+128。35.李新,公司治理、债券信用评级与债券融资成本,财会通讯,2016(06),92-95。36.廉永辉、何晓月、张琳,企业ESG表现与债务融资成本,财经论丛,2023(01),48-58。37.刘任重、杜婧修,信号效应、政府补贴与融资约束,哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(02),58-70。38.刘树良、闫明丽,ESG表现、代理成本与融资约束——基于企业生命周期的调节作用,工业技术经济,2024(12),62-72。39.陆孟慈,正式和非正式环境规制对中国制造业环境绩效和经济绩效的影响研究,统计与管理,2021(09),10-17。40.马珩、金尧娇,异质性环境规制、环保投资与企业绩效——财务与环境双重绩效视角,会计之友,2022(09),25-32。41.马永远、沈奥,企业社会失责媒体曝光与投资者选择性反应,管理科学,2022(02),60-71。42.倪娟、孔令文,环境信息披露、银行信贷决策与债务融资成本——来自我国沪深两市A股重污染行业上市公司的经验证据,经济评论,2016(01),147-156+160。43.潘翻番、徐建华、薛澜,自愿型环境规制,研究进展及未来展望,中国人口·资源与环境,2020(01),74-82。44.彭海珍、任荣明,环境保护私人供给的经济学分析——基于一个俱乐部物品模型,中国工业经济,2004(05),68-75。45.彭文斌,路江林.环境规制与绿色创新政策:基于外部性的理论逻辑[J].社会科学,2017,(10):73-83。46.彭星、李斌,不同类型环境规制下中国工业绿色转型问题研究,财经研究,2016(07),134-144。47.秦楠、刘李华、孙早,环境规制对就业的影响研究——基于中国工业行业异质性的视角,经济评论,2018(01),106-119。48.阮敏、肖风,自愿参与型环境规制与企业技术创新——公众关注度和市场进程的调节作用,科技进步与对策,2022(02),79-90。49.苏坤,国有金字塔层级对公司风险承担的影响——基于政府控制级别差异的分析,中国工业经济,2016(06),127-143。50.谭琳、刘江涛、贺康,企业环保投资的治理效应——基于杠杆操纵视角,工业技术经济,2025(01),140-149。51.田光辉、苗长虹、胡志强等,环境规制、地方保护与中国污染密集型产业布局,地理学报,2018(10),1954-1969。52.王琳、方园、汪长英,ES G表现对企业高质量发展的影响研究,会计之友,2023(13),74-81。53.王清刚、徐欣宇,企业社会责任的价值创造机理及实证检验——基于利益相关者理论和生命周期理论,中国软科学,2016(02),179-192。54.王治、彭百川,企业ESG表现对创新绩效的影响,统计与决策,2022(24),164-168。55.王竹泉、王贞洁、李静,经营风险与营运资金融资决策,会计研究,2017(05),60-67+97。56.魏志华、曾爱民、李博,金融生态环境与企业融资约束——基于中国上市公司的实证研究,会计研究,2014(05),73-80+95。57.温湖炜、周凤秀,环境规制与中国省域绿色全要素生产率——兼论对《环境保护税法》实施的启示,干旱区资源与环境,2019(02),9-15。58.温忠麟、叶宝娟,中介效应分析,方法和模型发展,心理科学进展,2014(05),731-745。59.吴红军、刘啟仁、吴世农,公司环保信息披露与融资约束,世界经济,2017(05),124-147。60.吴力波、杨眉敏、孙可哿,公众环境关注度对企业和政府环境治理的影响,中国人口·资源与环境,2022(02),1-14。61.吴青川、邵玉清、高轶昕,ESG表现、媒体关注与债务融资成本,会计之友,2025(01),63-70。62.肖红军、张俊生、李伟阳,企业伪社会责任行为研究,中国工业经济,2013(06),109- 120。63.熊俊、谭洪波、孙新章,中国环境规制的就业效应研究——基于企业层面的微观影响分析,价格理论与实践,2022(09),93-96+205。64.徐召红、李秀荣,企业社会责任的耦合推进机制设计,宏观经济研究,2018(01),146-155。65.杨东宁、周长辉,企业自愿采用标准化环境管理体系的驱动力,理论框架及实证分析,管理世界,2005(02),85-95+107。66.杨柳、甘佺鑫、马德水,公众环境关注度与企业环保投资——基于绿色形象的调节作用视角,财会月刊,2020(08),33-40。67.杨冕、王恩泽、叶初升,环境管理体系认证与中国制造业企业出口“增量提质”,中国工业经济,2022(06),155-173。68.杨皖苏、叶明丹,ESG信息披露会缓解企业融资约束吗?——基于数字普惠金融的调节效应,财会通讯,2023(18),42-47。69.伊志宏、陈欣、田柳,公众环境关注对企业绿色创新的影响,经济理论与经济管理,2022(07),32-48。70.仪秀琴、孙赫,ESG表现能否有效缓解企业融资约束:基于融资渠道的研究,金融与经济,2023(07),65-75。71.于连超、董晋亭、王雷等,环境管理体系认证有助于缓解企业融资约束吗?审计与经济研究,2021(06),116-126。72.于欣晔、冯永琦,货币政策、融资约束与实体企业融资,国际金融研究,2023(12),83-93。73.张宝.规制内涵变迁与现代环境法的演进[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(12):155-163.74.张国兴、冯祎琛、王爱玲,不同类型环境规制对工业企业技术创新的异质性作用研究,管理评论,2021(01),92-102。75.张小静、李延喜、栾庆伟,企业环境自我规制的动因及其政策启示,生态经济,2011(08),68-72。76.张晓敏,邬娜,吴佳,等.环境规制内涵、表征及应用述评[J].环境工程技术学报,2021,11(06):1250-1257.77.张莹、李健,两权分离会导致更严重的企业融资约束么?南方金融,2019(07),40-50。78.张优智、乔宇鹤,不同类型环境规制对产业结构升级的空间效应研究——基于空间面板杜宾模型的实证分析,生态经济,2021(06),66-73。79.张兆国、张弛、曹丹婷,企业环境管理体系认证有效吗,南开管理评论,2019(04),123-134。80.赵建华、宋金、夏越冰等,货币政策、金融发展水平与债务融资成本,投资研究,2020(04),65-76。81.赵天骄、肖翔、姜钰羡,企业社会责任与企业投资水平——基于企业生命周期的视角,北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019(06),107-115。82.赵玉民、朱方明、贺立龙,环境规制的界定、分类与演进研究,中国人口·资源与环境,2009(06),85-90。83.植草益【日】. 微观规制经济学[M],朱绍文等译,北京:中国发展出版社, 1992。84.周迪、彭小玲、黄晴,命令型环境规制能否推动企业研发创新活动?——以“大气十条”为例,科研管理,2022(10),81-88。85.周楷唐、麻志明、吴联生,高管学术经历与公司债务融资成本,经济研究,2017(07),169-183。86.朱丽娟、王淑贺,黄河流域异质性环境规制与水资源利用效率的关系,人民黄河,2022(06),76-80+87。87.朱秋华、杨毅、杨婷,信息披露质量、供应链金融与中小企业融资约束——基于创业板上市公司的经验证据,企业经济,2019(06),89-96。88.邹萍、李谷成,儒家文化能促进企业社会责任吗?经济评论,2022(02),154-170。二、英文参考文献89.Abd Rahman, Nor Hawani Wan, Mustaffa Mohamed Zain, and Norashfah Hanim Yaakop Yahaya Al‐Haj, 2011, CSR disclosures and its determinants, evidence from Malaysian gov-ernment link companies, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 7, pp.81-201.90.Andrikopoulos A, Kriklani N, 2013, Environmental disclosure and financial characteristics of the firm, The case of Denmark, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 20, pp.55-64.91.Arocena P, Orcos R, Zouaghi F, 2021, The impact of ISO 14001 on firm environmental and economic performance, The moderating role of size and environmental awareness, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 30, pp.955-967. 92.Axjonow A, Ernstberger J, Pott C, 2018, The impact of corporate social responsibility dis-closure on corporate reputation, A non-professional stakeholder perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 151, pp.429-450.93.Babakri KA, Bennett RA, Rao S, et al., 2004, Recycling performance of firms before and after adoption of the ISO 14001 standard, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 12, pp.633-637.94.Bai X, Han. J, Ma Y, Zhang W, 2022, ESG performance, institutional investors’preference and financing constraints, Empirical evidence from China, Borsa Istanbul Review, Vol. 22, pp.S157–S168.95.Barla P, 2007, ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec's pulp and paper industry, Journal of environmental economics and management, Vol. 53, pp.291-306.96.Blackman A, 2008, Can voluntary environmental regulation work in developing countries? Lessons from case studies, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 36, pp.118-141.97.Boiral O, 2012, ISO certificates as organizational degrees? Beyond the rational myths of the certification process, Organization Studies, Vol. 33, pp.633-654.98.Boubaker S, Cellier A, Manita R, et al., 2020, Does corporate social responsibility reduce financial distress risk? Economic Modelling, Vol. 91, pp.835-851.99.Carrion-Flores C E, Innes R, Sam A G, 2006, Do voluntary pollution reduction programs (VPRs)spur innovation in environmental technology.100.Chan C Y, Chou D W, Lo H C, 2017, Do financial constraints matter when firms engage in CSR? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 39, pp.241-259.101.Chen X, Yi N, Zhang L, et al., 2018, Does institutional pressure foster corporate green inno-vation? Evidence from China's top 100 companies, Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 188, pp.304-311.102.Cheung Y L, Tan W, Wang W, 2018, National stakeholder orientation, corporate social re-sponsibility, and bank loan cost, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 150, pp.505-524.103.Chiarini A, 2014, Strategies for developing an environmentally sustainable supply chain, differences between manufacturing and service sectors, Business Strategy and the Environ-ment, Vol. 23, pp.493-504.104.Czubala W, Shepherd B, Wilson J, 2007, Help or Hindrance? The Impact of Harmonised Standards on African Exports, Policy Research Working Paper, Vol. 5, pp.1-39.105.Daddi T, Testa F, Frey M, et al, 2016, Exploring the link between institutional pressures and environmental management systems effectiveness, An empirical study, Journal of environ-mental management, Vol. 183, pp.647-656.106.Dahlström K, Howes C, Leinster P, et al., 2003, Environmental management systems and company performance, assessing the case for extending risk‐based regulation, European Environment, Vol. 13, pp.187-203.107.Dasgupta S, Hettige H, Wheeler D, 2000, What improves environmental compliance? Evi-dence from Mexican industry, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 39, pp.39-66.108.de Paula L B, Vélez S L P, Ceballos H V, et al, 2020, Exploring the link between environ-mental practices and financial performance, an empirical Study, Journal of Environmental Science and Management, Vol. 23.109.Duque‐Grisales E, Aguilera‐Caracuel J, Guerrero‐Villegas J, et al,,2020,Does green in-novation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 29, pp.3286-3302.110.Fan F, Lian H, Liu X, et al., 2021, Can environmental regulation promote urban green inno-vation Efficiency? An empirical study based on Chinese cities, Journal of Cleaner Produc-tion, Vol. 287, pp.125060.111.Fazzari S, Hubbard R G, Petersen B, 1988, Investment, financing decisions, and tax policy, The American economic review, Vol. 78, pp.200-205.112.Fu S, Ma Z, Ni B, et al., 2021, Research on the spatial differences of pollution-intensive in-dustry transfer under the environmental regulation in China, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 129, pp.107921.113.Galati A, Gianguzzi G, Tinervia S, et al., 2017, Motivations, adoption and impact of volun-tary environmental certification in the Italian Forest based industry, The case of the FSC standard, Forest policy and economics, Vol. 83, pp.169-176.114.Garel A, Petit-Romec A, 2021, Investor rewards to environmental responsibility, Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 68, pp,101948.115.Godos-Díez J-L, Fernández-Gago, R, & Martínez-Campillo, A, 2010, How Important Are CEOs to CSR Practices? An Analysis of the Mediating Effect of the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 98, pp.531–548.116.Goss A, Roberts G S, 2011, The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans, Journal of banking & finance, Vol. 35, pp.1794-1810.117.Guo J, Bai J, 2019, The role of public participation in environmental governance, Empirical evidence from China, Sustainability, Vol. 11, pp.4696.118.Hudson J, Orviska M, 2013, Firms’ adoption of international standards, One size fits all?, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 35, pp.289-306.119.Islam T, Islam R, Pitafi A H, et al., 2021, he impact of corporate social responsibility on cus-tomer loyalty, The mediating role of corporate reputation,customer satisfaction, and trust, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol. 25, pp.123-135.120.Jeffrey S, Rosenberg S, McCabe B, 2019, Corporate social responsibility behaviors and corporate reputation, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 15, pp.395-408.121.Ji S, Ren Y, 2017, Research on the impact of tight-money policy on corporate financing con-straints. In 2017 4th International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Indus-trial Security Engineering (IEIS), pp.1-6. 122.Ji L, Jia P, Yan J, 2021, Green credit, environmental protection investment and debt financ-ing for heavily polluting enterprises, Plos one, Vol.16, pp.e0261311.123.Jiang Z, Wang Z, Zeng Y, 2020, Can voluntary environmental regulation promote corporate technological innovation? Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol.29, pp.390-406.124.Kahn A E, 1988, The economics of regulation, principles and institutions[M], MIT press.125.Kaplan S N, Zingales L, 1995, Do financing constraints explain why investment is correlat-ed with cash flow?126.Khurana I K, Martin X, Pereira R, 2006, Financial development and the cash flow sensitivity of cash, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 41, pp.787-808.127.Kube R, Graevenitz K, Löschel A, et al., 2019, Do voluntary environmental programs reduce emissions? EMAS in the German manufacturing sector, Energy Economics, Vol. 84, pp.104558.128.Li Y, Chen R, Xiang E, 2022, Corporate social responsibility, green financial system guide-lines, and cost of debt financing, Evidence from pollution‐intensive industries in China, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 29, pp.593-608.129.Liao L Lin T, Zhang Y, 2018, Corporate board and corporate social responsibility assurance, Evidence from China, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 150, pp.211-225.130.Liao Z, 2018, Environmental policy instruments, environmental innovation and the reputa-tion of enterprises, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 171, pp.1111-1117.131.Lin H, Zeng S, Wang L et al., 2016, How does environmental irresponsibility impair corpo-rate reputation? A multi‐method investigation, Corporate Social Responsibility and Envi-ronmental Management, Vol. 23, pp.413-423.132.Luo Q, Li H, Zhang B, 2015, Financing constraints and the cost of equity, Evidence on the moral hazard of the controlling shareholder, International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol. 36, pp.99-106.133.Martín‐de Castro, Gregorio, et al., 2020, "Corporate environmental reputation, Exploring its definitional landscape," Business Ethics, A European Review, Vol.29, pp.130-142.134.Meckling W H, Jensen M C, 1976, Theory of the Firm, Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.135.Paulraj Riaz H, Saeed A, 2020, Impact of environmental policy on firm's market perfor-mance, The case of ISO 14001, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Man-agement, Vol. 27, pp.681-693.136.Paulraj, Antony, and Pieter De Jong, 2011, "The effect of ISO 14001 certification an-nouncements on stock performance," International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 31, pp.765-788.137.Pedersen LH, Fitzgibbons S, Pomorski L, 2021, Responsible investing, The ESG-efficient frontier, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 142, pp.572-597.138.Prakash A, & Potoski M, 2006, Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001, American journal of political science, Vol.50, pp.350-364.139.Riedl A, Smeets P, 2017, Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds?, The Journal of Finance, Vol.72, pp.2505-2550.140.Short J L, Toffel M W, 2010, Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic, The criti-cal role of the legal environment, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 55, pp.361-396.141.Spence M, 1978, Job market signaling. Uncertainty in economics, pp.281-306.142.Testa F, Boiral O, Iraldo F, 2018, Internalization of environmental practices and institutional complexity, Can stakeholders pressures encourage greenwashing? Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 147, pp.287-307.143.Tibiletti V, Marchini P L, Furlotti K, et al., 2021, Does corporate governance matter in cor-porate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 8, pp.896-907.144.Treacy R, Humphreys P, McIvor R, et al., 2019, ISO14001 certification and operating per-formance, A practice-based view, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 208, pp.319-328.145.Wang E Z, Lee C, 2022, The impact of clean energy consumption on economic growth in China, is environmental regulation a curse or a blessing? International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol.77, pp.39-58.146.Wang J, Zhou Y, 2021, Impact of mass media on public awareness, The “Under the Dome” effect in China, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 173, pp.121145.147.Waxin M F, Knuteson S L, Bartholomew A, 2019, Outcomes and key factors of success for ISO 14001 certification, Evidence from an emerging arab gulf country, Sustainability, Vol. 12, pp.258.148.Wu J, Ma Z, 2016, Export intensity and MNE customers’ environmental requirements, Ef-fects on local Chinese suppliers’ environment strategies, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 135, pp.327-339.149.Wu W, An S, Wu C H, et al., 2020, An empirical study on green environmental system certi-fication affects financing cost of high energy consumption enterprises-taking metallurgical enterprises as an example, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 244, pp.118848.150.Yang Z, Liu P, Luo L, 2024, How Does Environmental Regulation Affect Corporate Green Innovation, A Comparative Study between Voluntary and Mandatory Environmental Regu-lations, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol.26, pp.130-158.151.Yu Y, Choi Y, 2016, Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption, The mediating role of organi-zational culture for Chinese companies, The Social Science Journal, Vol.53, pp.226–235.152.Zhang G, Zhang P, Zhang Z G, et al., 2019, Impact of environmental regulations on indus-trial structure upgrading, An empirical study on Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 238, pp.117848.153.Zhang Y, Ruan H, Tang G, et al., 2021, Power of sustainable development, Does environ-mental management system certification affect a firm's access to finance? Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 30, pp.3772-3788.154.Zhang Y, Xing C, Wang Y, 2020, Does green innovation mitigate financing constraints? Ev-idence from China’s private enterprises, Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 264, pp.121698.155.Zhou D, Yuan S, Xie D, 2022, Voluntary environmental regulation and urban innovation, evidence from low-carbon pilot cities program in China, Technological Forecasting and So-cial Change, Vol. 175, pp.121388.

学科:

应用经济学

提交日期

2025-05-25

引用参考

张媛淋. 自愿型环境规制对企业融资约束的影响研究[D]. 西南政法大学,2025.

全文附件授权许可

知识共享许可协议-署名

  • dc.title
  • 自愿型环境规制对企业融资约束的影响研究
  • dc.title
  • Research on the impact of voluntary environmental regulation on corporate financing constraints
  • dc.contributor.schoolno
  • 20220202000044
  • dc.contributor.author
  • 张媛淋
  • dc.contributor.affiliation
  • 经济学院(数字经济学院)
  • dc.contributor.degree
  • 硕士
  • dc.contributor.childdegree
  • 经济学硕士学位
  • dc.contributor.degreeConferringInstitution
  • 西南政法大学
  • dc.identifier.year
  • 2025
  • dc.contributor.direction
  • 国民经济学
  • dc.contributor.advisor
  • 陈屹立
  • dc.contributor.advisorAffiliation
  • 经济学院(数字经济学院)
  • dc.language.iso
  • 中文
  • dc.subject
  • 自愿型环境规制,融资约束,信息不对称,经营风险,声誉
  • dc.subject
  • Voluntary environmental regulation; Financing constraints; Information asym-metry; Business risk; Reputation
  • dc.description.abstract
  • 党的二十大报告指出,推动经济社会发展绿色化、低碳化是实现高质量发展的关键环节,实现碳达峰、碳中和是一场广泛而深刻的经济社会系统性变革。这对绿色发展理念,绿色低碳的生产方式和生活方式提出了更高要求。随着企业环保实践的不断发展,自愿型环境规制成为继命令控制型环境规制和市场型环境规制后一种新型的环境规制工具。在全球气候危机加剧与“双碳”战略纵深推进的背景下,自愿型环境规制工具作为政府规制体系的重要补充,正通过企业在资源消耗和环境保护方面的自愿行动重塑市场运行逻辑。与此同时,不容忽视的是,企业的环保问题已经传导至资本市场,影响着外部利益相关者对企业的投资倾向,进一步表现为企业的融资问题。而资金融通的受限又阻碍着企业的绿色转型,影响国家产业结构优化升级。因此,参与自愿型环境规制能否对企业的融资约束产生影响?如果可以,其作用机制又是什么?厘清并回答这些问题是有意义且必要的。 为达到研究目的,本文做了如下努力:首先,在对国内外文献研读及梳理的基础上,分析阐述了环境规制的概念、内涵,对主流的环境规制类型进行归纳总结,并对自愿型环境规制的内外部动因及对企业绩效的影响做了较为详细且充分的展示,对融资约束领域相关研究以及融资约束和自愿型环境规制二者关系的文献做了系统归纳。其次,结合相关理论进行理论推演,提出研究假说。再次,本文以2010—2022年中国沪深A股上市公司作为研究样本,实证检验参与自愿型环境规制对企业融资约束的影响,同时对基准回归进行稳健性检验,并进一步从企业、地区和市场层面进行异质性探讨。紧接着,实证检验参与自愿型环境规制对企业融资约束可能存在的影响渠道。最后得出研究结论,并联系实际多角度提出相关的政策建议和管理启示。 本文的研究结果表明:(1)参与自愿型环境规制对缓解企业融资约束发挥着积极的作用;(2)机制分析结果表明,企业参与自愿型环境规制可以通过降低信息不对称、降低经营风险、提高声誉三方面作用于融资约束的缓解;(3)异质性分析结果表明,参与自愿型环境规制可能对非国有企业、非重污染企业、位于市场化程度高的地区的企业、处于成长期或成熟期的企业在缓解融资约束上的效果更加明显。 最后,结合实证研究结果,本文从政府、社会和企业三方提出了相应的针对性建议,以更好激发企业参与自愿型环境规制的主动性和积极性,推动整个社会的可持续化发展:(1)政府要扮演好引导员、管理员和监督员的角色,多举措将融资约束转化为拉动企业参与自愿型环境规制的内生动力;(2)社会主体,比如大众传媒要做好环保文化的传播者和环保事实的揭露者,投资者做好企业环境治理的资金激励者,消费者做好企业环境治理的产品投票者;(3)企业要做环境治理的坚守者,树立长期主义,提高环保意识,主动提升绿色实践的能动性,强化自身环保责任。
  • dc.description.abstract
  • The report of the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China points out that promoting the green and low-carbon transformation of economic and social development is a key link in achieving high-quality development, and achiev-ing carbon peaking and carbon neutrality is a profound and extensive systemic trans-formation of the economy and society. This places higher demands on the concept of green development, green and low-carbon production and lifestyle. With the contin-uous development of enterprises' environmental protection practices, voluntary en-vironmental regulation has emerged as a new type of environmental regulation tool following command-and-control and market-based environmental regulation. Against the backdrop of the intensifying global climate crisis and the in-depth ad-vancement of the "dual carbon" strategy, voluntary environmental regulation, as an important supplement to the government's regulatory system, is reshaping the market operation logic through enterprises' voluntary actions in resource consumption and environmental protection. At the same time, it cannot be ignored that enterprises' en-vironmental protection issues have been transmitted to the capital market, affecting external stakeholders' investment preferences for enterprises, and further manifesting as enterprises' financing problems. The restricted access to funds, in turn, hinders en-terprises' green transformation and affects the optimization and upgrading of the na-tional industrial structure. Therefore, can voluntary environmental regulation have an impact on enterprises' financing constraints? If so, what is the mechanism? It is meaningful and necessary to clarify and answer these questions. To achieve the research purpose, this paper has made the following efforts: Firstly, based on the reading and sorting of domestic and foreign literature, it analyz-es and expounds the concept and connotation of environmental regulation, summa-rizes the mainstream types of environmental regulation, and presents a detailed and comprehensive display of the internal and external motivations of voluntary envi-ronmental regulation and its impact on enterprise performance. It also systematically summarizes the relevant research in the field of financing constraints and the litera-ture on the relationship between financing constraints and voluntary environmental regulation. Secondly, it conducts theoretical reasoning based on relevant theories and proposes research hypotheses. Thirdly, this paper takes Chinese A-share listed com-panies on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2010 to 2022 as the re-search sample to empirically test the impact of participation in voluntary environ-mental regulation on enterprises' financing constraints, and conducts robustness tests on the benchmark regression. It further explores the heterogeneity from the perspec-tives of enterprises, regions, and markets. Then, it empirically tests the possible channels through which participation in voluntary environmental regulation affects enterprises' financing constraints. Finally, it draws research conclusions and puts forward relevant policy suggestions and management implications from multiple perspectives in light of the actual situation. The research results of this paper show that: (1) Participation in voluntary envi-ronmental regulation plays a positive role in alleviating enterprises' financing con-straints; (2) The mechanism analysis results indicate that enterprises' participation in voluntary environmental regulation can alleviate financing constraints through three aspects: reducing information asymmetry, reducing operational risks, and enhancing reputation; (3) The heterogeneity analysis results show that participation in voluntary environmental regulation may have a more significant effect on alleviating financing constraints for non-state-owned enterprises, non-heavy-polluting enterprises, enter-prises located in regions with a high degree of marketization, and enterprises in the growth or mature stage. Finally, in light of the empirical research results, this paper puts forward corre-sponding targeted suggestions from the perspectives of the government, society, and enterprises to better stimulate enterprises' initiative and enthusiasm in participating in voluntary environmental regulation and promote the sustainable development of the entire society: (1) The government should play the roles of guide, manager, and supervisor, and take multiple measures to transform financing constraints into an en-dogenous driving force for enterprises to participate in voluntary environmental reg-ulation; (2) Social entities, such as the mass media, should act as disseminators of environmental protection culture and exposers of environmental facts. Investors should serve as financial motivators for enterprises' environmental governance. Consumers should function as product voters for enterprises' environmental govern-ance; (3) Enterprises should be the defenders of environmental governance, embrace long-termism, enhance environmental awareness, proactively increase the initiative of green practices, and strengthen their own environmental responsibilities.
  • dc.date.issued
  • 2025-05-25
  • dc.date.oralDefense
  • 2025-05-15
  • dc.relation.citedreferences
  • 一、中文参考文献1.白俊红、芮静,环境规制、经济增长目标管理与中国经济高质量发展,宏观质量研究,2023(03),32-47。2.步晓宁、赵丽华,自愿性环境规制与企业污染排放——基于政府节能采购政策的实证检验,财经研究,2022(04),49-63。3.曾珍香、张早春、王梦雅,企业社会责任表现、报告质量与企业声誉——基于中国上市公司的实证研究,工业技术经济,2017(06),87-95。4.陈洪涛、束雯、王双英,公司治理结构、财务特征对环境信息披露影响的实证研究,南京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2017(02),1-9。5.陈若鸿、赵雪延、金华,企业ESG表现对其融资成本的影响,科学决策,2022(11),24-40。6.陈艳莹、平靓,环境管理体系认证的出口贸易效应——基于包含多边阻力项引力模型的实证研究,世界经济研究,2017(07),99-109+121+137。7.成德宁、韦锦辉,不同类型环境规制影响我国产业竞争力的效应分析,广东财经大学学报,2019(03),26-33。8.杜兴强、殷敬伟、张颖等,国际化董事会与企业环境绩效,会计研究,2021(10),84-96。9.冯丽艳、肖翔、张靖,企业社会责任影响债务违约风险的内在机制——基于经营能力和经营风险的中介传导效应分析,华东经济管理,2016(04),140-148。10.傅京燕、李丽莎,环境规制、要素禀赋与产业国际竞争力的实证研究——基于中国制造业的面板数据,管理世界,2010(10),87-98+187。11.高凡雅、田高良、王喜,中小企业履行社会责任能缓解融资约束吗?科学学与科学技术管理,2017(06),133-143。12.高宏霞、朱海燕、孟樊俊,环境信息披露质量影响债务融资成本吗?——来自我国环境敏感型行业上市公司的经验证据,南京审计大学学报,2018(06),20-28。13.高明、陈巧辉,不同类型环境规制对产业升级的影响,工业技术经济,2019(01),91-99。14.关海玲、屈田雨,环境规制对产业结构升级的影响——基于中国284个地级市的经验证据,经济问题,2023(07),29-37。15.管宏友、毕春伟,环境管理中信息不对称问题研究,资源与产业,2010(03),137-14216.郭进、徐盈之,公众参与环境治理的逻辑、路径与效应,资源科学,2020(07),1372-1383。17.郭景先、巩文杰,企业ESG表现对债务违约风险的影响——基于企业生命周期理论视角,金融与经济,2023(11),21-30+45。18.郭玲玲、石玮,环境成本与企业绩效关系:来自重污染行业上市公司的证据,管理学刊,2022(02),87-102。19.郭庆宾、刘琪、张冰倩,不同类型环境规制对国际R&D溢出效应的影响比较研究,以长江经济带为例,长江流域资源与环境,2017(11),1752-1760。 20.韩纪琴、夏梦,环境规制对产业竞争力影响的研究——基于江苏制造业数据的分析,价格理论与实践,2018(08),135-138。21.何兴邦,环境规制与中国经济增长质量——基于省际面板数据的实证分析,当代经济科学,2018(02),1-10+124。22.侯超惠、张浩,ESG评价对企业融资约束的影响研究,中国集体经济,2024(08),70-73。23.胡湉湉、纪莉,环境报道的责任建构探究——兼论中国式现代化背景下媒体对公众环境参与的影响,天府新论,2023(05),131-139。24.胡元林、崔丹,企业环保投资影响因素的实证研究,生态经济,2019(01),161-166。25.花拥军、王冰、李庆,企业社会责任、经济政策不确定性与融资约束——基于社会责任“累积-保险”效应的研究视角,南方经济,2020(11),116-131。26.黄佳,公司治理、持续经营审计意见与企业债务融资成本,财会通讯,2019(24),33-36+57。27.黄新华.从干预型政府到规制型政府——建构面向国家治理现代化的政府与市场关系[J].厦门大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2017(03):78-88。28.江艇,因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应,中国工业经济,2022(05),100-120。29.靳小翠,企业文化会影响企业社会责任吗?——来自中国沪市上市公司的经验证据,会计研究,2017(02),56-62+97。30.黎文靖、路晓燕,机构投资者关注企业的环境绩效吗?——来自我国重污染行业上市公司的经验证据,金融研究,2015(12),97-112。31.李虹、张希源,管理层能力与企业环境责任关系研究——基于模仿压力和强制压力调节作用视角,华东经济管理,2016(08),139-146。32.李思慧,环境规制与城市绿色创新:助力抑或阻力?现代经济探讨,2023(02),94-104。33.李万利、陈亮、袁凯彬,互联网能否增强传统媒体的外部治理功能?——基于媒体环境报道与企业绿色创新视角,南开管理评论,2023,1-26。34.李晓英,FDI、环境规制与产业结构优化——基于空间计量模型的实证,当代经济科学,2018(02),104-113+128。35.李新,公司治理、债券信用评级与债券融资成本,财会通讯,2016(06),92-95。36.廉永辉、何晓月、张琳,企业ESG表现与债务融资成本,财经论丛,2023(01),48-58。37.刘任重、杜婧修,信号效应、政府补贴与融资约束,哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2022(02),58-70。38.刘树良、闫明丽,ESG表现、代理成本与融资约束——基于企业生命周期的调节作用,工业技术经济,2024(12),62-72。39.陆孟慈,正式和非正式环境规制对中国制造业环境绩效和经济绩效的影响研究,统计与管理,2021(09),10-17。40.马珩、金尧娇,异质性环境规制、环保投资与企业绩效——财务与环境双重绩效视角,会计之友,2022(09),25-32。41.马永远、沈奥,企业社会失责媒体曝光与投资者选择性反应,管理科学,2022(02),60-71。42.倪娟、孔令文,环境信息披露、银行信贷决策与债务融资成本——来自我国沪深两市A股重污染行业上市公司的经验证据,经济评论,2016(01),147-156+160。43.潘翻番、徐建华、薛澜,自愿型环境规制,研究进展及未来展望,中国人口·资源与环境,2020(01),74-82。44.彭海珍、任荣明,环境保护私人供给的经济学分析——基于一个俱乐部物品模型,中国工业经济,2004(05),68-75。45.彭文斌,路江林.环境规制与绿色创新政策:基于外部性的理论逻辑[J].社会科学,2017,(10):73-83。46.彭星、李斌,不同类型环境规制下中国工业绿色转型问题研究,财经研究,2016(07),134-144。47.秦楠、刘李华、孙早,环境规制对就业的影响研究——基于中国工业行业异质性的视角,经济评论,2018(01),106-119。48.阮敏、肖风,自愿参与型环境规制与企业技术创新——公众关注度和市场进程的调节作用,科技进步与对策,2022(02),79-90。49.苏坤,国有金字塔层级对公司风险承担的影响——基于政府控制级别差异的分析,中国工业经济,2016(06),127-143。50.谭琳、刘江涛、贺康,企业环保投资的治理效应——基于杠杆操纵视角,工业技术经济,2025(01),140-149。51.田光辉、苗长虹、胡志强等,环境规制、地方保护与中国污染密集型产业布局,地理学报,2018(10),1954-1969。52.王琳、方园、汪长英,ES G表现对企业高质量发展的影响研究,会计之友,2023(13),74-81。53.王清刚、徐欣宇,企业社会责任的价值创造机理及实证检验——基于利益相关者理论和生命周期理论,中国软科学,2016(02),179-192。54.王治、彭百川,企业ESG表现对创新绩效的影响,统计与决策,2022(24),164-168。55.王竹泉、王贞洁、李静,经营风险与营运资金融资决策,会计研究,2017(05),60-67+97。56.魏志华、曾爱民、李博,金融生态环境与企业融资约束——基于中国上市公司的实证研究,会计研究,2014(05),73-80+95。57.温湖炜、周凤秀,环境规制与中国省域绿色全要素生产率——兼论对《环境保护税法》实施的启示,干旱区资源与环境,2019(02),9-15。58.温忠麟、叶宝娟,中介效应分析,方法和模型发展,心理科学进展,2014(05),731-745。59.吴红军、刘啟仁、吴世农,公司环保信息披露与融资约束,世界经济,2017(05),124-147。60.吴力波、杨眉敏、孙可哿,公众环境关注度对企业和政府环境治理的影响,中国人口·资源与环境,2022(02),1-14。61.吴青川、邵玉清、高轶昕,ESG表现、媒体关注与债务融资成本,会计之友,2025(01),63-70。62.肖红军、张俊生、李伟阳,企业伪社会责任行为研究,中国工业经济,2013(06),109- 120。63.熊俊、谭洪波、孙新章,中国环境规制的就业效应研究——基于企业层面的微观影响分析,价格理论与实践,2022(09),93-96+205。64.徐召红、李秀荣,企业社会责任的耦合推进机制设计,宏观经济研究,2018(01),146-155。65.杨东宁、周长辉,企业自愿采用标准化环境管理体系的驱动力,理论框架及实证分析,管理世界,2005(02),85-95+107。66.杨柳、甘佺鑫、马德水,公众环境关注度与企业环保投资——基于绿色形象的调节作用视角,财会月刊,2020(08),33-40。67.杨冕、王恩泽、叶初升,环境管理体系认证与中国制造业企业出口“增量提质”,中国工业经济,2022(06),155-173。68.杨皖苏、叶明丹,ESG信息披露会缓解企业融资约束吗?——基于数字普惠金融的调节效应,财会通讯,2023(18),42-47。69.伊志宏、陈欣、田柳,公众环境关注对企业绿色创新的影响,经济理论与经济管理,2022(07),32-48。70.仪秀琴、孙赫,ESG表现能否有效缓解企业融资约束:基于融资渠道的研究,金融与经济,2023(07),65-75。71.于连超、董晋亭、王雷等,环境管理体系认证有助于缓解企业融资约束吗?审计与经济研究,2021(06),116-126。72.于欣晔、冯永琦,货币政策、融资约束与实体企业融资,国际金融研究,2023(12),83-93。73.张宝.规制内涵变迁与现代环境法的演进[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2020,30(12):155-163.74.张国兴、冯祎琛、王爱玲,不同类型环境规制对工业企业技术创新的异质性作用研究,管理评论,2021(01),92-102。75.张小静、李延喜、栾庆伟,企业环境自我规制的动因及其政策启示,生态经济,2011(08),68-72。76.张晓敏,邬娜,吴佳,等.环境规制内涵、表征及应用述评[J].环境工程技术学报,2021,11(06):1250-1257.77.张莹、李健,两权分离会导致更严重的企业融资约束么?南方金融,2019(07),40-50。78.张优智、乔宇鹤,不同类型环境规制对产业结构升级的空间效应研究——基于空间面板杜宾模型的实证分析,生态经济,2021(06),66-73。79.张兆国、张弛、曹丹婷,企业环境管理体系认证有效吗,南开管理评论,2019(04),123-134。80.赵建华、宋金、夏越冰等,货币政策、金融发展水平与债务融资成本,投资研究,2020(04),65-76。81.赵天骄、肖翔、姜钰羡,企业社会责任与企业投资水平——基于企业生命周期的视角,北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2019(06),107-115。82.赵玉民、朱方明、贺立龙,环境规制的界定、分类与演进研究,中国人口·资源与环境,2009(06),85-90。83.植草益【日】. 微观规制经济学[M],朱绍文等译,北京:中国发展出版社, 1992。84.周迪、彭小玲、黄晴,命令型环境规制能否推动企业研发创新活动?——以“大气十条”为例,科研管理,2022(10),81-88。85.周楷唐、麻志明、吴联生,高管学术经历与公司债务融资成本,经济研究,2017(07),169-183。86.朱丽娟、王淑贺,黄河流域异质性环境规制与水资源利用效率的关系,人民黄河,2022(06),76-80+87。87.朱秋华、杨毅、杨婷,信息披露质量、供应链金融与中小企业融资约束——基于创业板上市公司的经验证据,企业经济,2019(06),89-96。88.邹萍、李谷成,儒家文化能促进企业社会责任吗?经济评论,2022(02),154-170。二、英文参考文献89.Abd Rahman, Nor Hawani Wan, Mustaffa Mohamed Zain, and Norashfah Hanim Yaakop Yahaya Al‐Haj, 2011, CSR disclosures and its determinants, evidence from Malaysian gov-ernment link companies, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 7, pp.81-201.90.Andrikopoulos A, Kriklani N, 2013, Environmental disclosure and financial characteristics of the firm, The case of Denmark, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 20, pp.55-64.91.Arocena P, Orcos R, Zouaghi F, 2021, The impact of ISO 14001 on firm environmental and economic performance, The moderating role of size and environmental awareness, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 30, pp.955-967. 92.Axjonow A, Ernstberger J, Pott C, 2018, The impact of corporate social responsibility dis-closure on corporate reputation, A non-professional stakeholder perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 151, pp.429-450.93.Babakri KA, Bennett RA, Rao S, et al., 2004, Recycling performance of firms before and after adoption of the ISO 14001 standard, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 12, pp.633-637.94.Bai X, Han. J, Ma Y, Zhang W, 2022, ESG performance, institutional investors’preference and financing constraints, Empirical evidence from China, Borsa Istanbul Review, Vol. 22, pp.S157–S168.95.Barla P, 2007, ISO 14001 certification and environmental performance in Quebec's pulp and paper industry, Journal of environmental economics and management, Vol. 53, pp.291-306.96.Blackman A, 2008, Can voluntary environmental regulation work in developing countries? Lessons from case studies, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 36, pp.118-141.97.Boiral O, 2012, ISO certificates as organizational degrees? Beyond the rational myths of the certification process, Organization Studies, Vol. 33, pp.633-654.98.Boubaker S, Cellier A, Manita R, et al., 2020, Does corporate social responsibility reduce financial distress risk? Economic Modelling, Vol. 91, pp.835-851.99.Carrion-Flores C E, Innes R, Sam A G, 2006, Do voluntary pollution reduction programs (VPRs)spur innovation in environmental technology.100.Chan C Y, Chou D W, Lo H C, 2017, Do financial constraints matter when firms engage in CSR? The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Vol. 39, pp.241-259.101.Chen X, Yi N, Zhang L, et al., 2018, Does institutional pressure foster corporate green inno-vation? Evidence from China's top 100 companies, Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 188, pp.304-311.102.Cheung Y L, Tan W, Wang W, 2018, National stakeholder orientation, corporate social re-sponsibility, and bank loan cost, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 150, pp.505-524.103.Chiarini A, 2014, Strategies for developing an environmentally sustainable supply chain, differences between manufacturing and service sectors, Business Strategy and the Environ-ment, Vol. 23, pp.493-504.104.Czubala W, Shepherd B, Wilson J, 2007, Help or Hindrance? The Impact of Harmonised Standards on African Exports, Policy Research Working Paper, Vol. 5, pp.1-39.105.Daddi T, Testa F, Frey M, et al, 2016, Exploring the link between institutional pressures and environmental management systems effectiveness, An empirical study, Journal of environ-mental management, Vol. 183, pp.647-656.106.Dahlström K, Howes C, Leinster P, et al., 2003, Environmental management systems and company performance, assessing the case for extending risk‐based regulation, European Environment, Vol. 13, pp.187-203.107.Dasgupta S, Hettige H, Wheeler D, 2000, What improves environmental compliance? Evi-dence from Mexican industry, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 39, pp.39-66.108.de Paula L B, Vélez S L P, Ceballos H V, et al, 2020, Exploring the link between environ-mental practices and financial performance, an empirical Study, Journal of Environmental Science and Management, Vol. 23.109.Duque‐Grisales E, Aguilera‐Caracuel J, Guerrero‐Villegas J, et al,,2020,Does green in-novation affect the financial performance of Multilatinas? The moderating role of ISO 14001 and R&D investment, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 29, pp.3286-3302.110.Fan F, Lian H, Liu X, et al., 2021, Can environmental regulation promote urban green inno-vation Efficiency? An empirical study based on Chinese cities, Journal of Cleaner Produc-tion, Vol. 287, pp.125060.111.Fazzari S, Hubbard R G, Petersen B, 1988, Investment, financing decisions, and tax policy, The American economic review, Vol. 78, pp.200-205.112.Fu S, Ma Z, Ni B, et al., 2021, Research on the spatial differences of pollution-intensive in-dustry transfer under the environmental regulation in China, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 129, pp.107921.113.Galati A, Gianguzzi G, Tinervia S, et al., 2017, Motivations, adoption and impact of volun-tary environmental certification in the Italian Forest based industry, The case of the FSC standard, Forest policy and economics, Vol. 83, pp.169-176.114.Garel A, Petit-Romec A, 2021, Investor rewards to environmental responsibility, Evidence from the COVID-19 crisis, Journal of Corporate Finance, Vol. 68, pp,101948.115.Godos-Díez J-L, Fernández-Gago, R, & Martínez-Campillo, A, 2010, How Important Are CEOs to CSR Practices? An Analysis of the Mediating Effect of the Perceived Role of Ethics and Social Responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 98, pp.531–548.116.Goss A, Roberts G S, 2011, The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans, Journal of banking & finance, Vol. 35, pp.1794-1810.117.Guo J, Bai J, 2019, The role of public participation in environmental governance, Empirical evidence from China, Sustainability, Vol. 11, pp.4696.118.Hudson J, Orviska M, 2013, Firms’ adoption of international standards, One size fits all?, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 35, pp.289-306.119.Islam T, Islam R, Pitafi A H, et al., 2021, he impact of corporate social responsibility on cus-tomer loyalty, The mediating role of corporate reputation,customer satisfaction, and trust, Sustainable Production and Consumption, Vol. 25, pp.123-135.120.Jeffrey S, Rosenberg S, McCabe B, 2019, Corporate social responsibility behaviors and corporate reputation, Social Responsibility Journal, Vol. 15, pp.395-408.121.Ji S, Ren Y, 2017, Research on the impact of tight-money policy on corporate financing con-straints. In 2017 4th International Conference on Industrial Economics System and Indus-trial Security Engineering (IEIS), pp.1-6. 122.Ji L, Jia P, Yan J, 2021, Green credit, environmental protection investment and debt financ-ing for heavily polluting enterprises, Plos one, Vol.16, pp.e0261311.123.Jiang Z, Wang Z, Zeng Y, 2020, Can voluntary environmental regulation promote corporate technological innovation? Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol.29, pp.390-406.124.Kahn A E, 1988, The economics of regulation, principles and institutions[M], MIT press.125.Kaplan S N, Zingales L, 1995, Do financing constraints explain why investment is correlat-ed with cash flow?126.Khurana I K, Martin X, Pereira R, 2006, Financial development and the cash flow sensitivity of cash, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol. 41, pp.787-808.127.Kube R, Graevenitz K, Löschel A, et al., 2019, Do voluntary environmental programs reduce emissions? EMAS in the German manufacturing sector, Energy Economics, Vol. 84, pp.104558.128.Li Y, Chen R, Xiang E, 2022, Corporate social responsibility, green financial system guide-lines, and cost of debt financing, Evidence from pollution‐intensive industries in China, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 29, pp.593-608.129.Liao L Lin T, Zhang Y, 2018, Corporate board and corporate social responsibility assurance, Evidence from China, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 150, pp.211-225.130.Liao Z, 2018, Environmental policy instruments, environmental innovation and the reputa-tion of enterprises, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 171, pp.1111-1117.131.Lin H, Zeng S, Wang L et al., 2016, How does environmental irresponsibility impair corpo-rate reputation? A multi‐method investigation, Corporate Social Responsibility and Envi-ronmental Management, Vol. 23, pp.413-423.132.Luo Q, Li H, Zhang B, 2015, Financing constraints and the cost of equity, Evidence on the moral hazard of the controlling shareholder, International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol. 36, pp.99-106.133.Martín‐de Castro, Gregorio, et al., 2020, "Corporate environmental reputation, Exploring its definitional landscape," Business Ethics, A European Review, Vol.29, pp.130-142.134.Meckling W H, Jensen M C, 1976, Theory of the Firm, Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure.135.Paulraj Riaz H, Saeed A, 2020, Impact of environmental policy on firm's market perfor-mance, The case of ISO 14001, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Man-agement, Vol. 27, pp.681-693.136.Paulraj, Antony, and Pieter De Jong, 2011, "The effect of ISO 14001 certification an-nouncements on stock performance," International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 31, pp.765-788.137.Pedersen LH, Fitzgibbons S, Pomorski L, 2021, Responsible investing, The ESG-efficient frontier, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 142, pp.572-597.138.Prakash A, & Potoski M, 2006, Racing to the bottom? Trade, environmental governance, and ISO 14001, American journal of political science, Vol.50, pp.350-364.139.Riedl A, Smeets P, 2017, Why do investors hold socially responsible mutual funds?, The Journal of Finance, Vol.72, pp.2505-2550.140.Short J L, Toffel M W, 2010, Making self-regulation more than merely symbolic, The criti-cal role of the legal environment, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 55, pp.361-396.141.Spence M, 1978, Job market signaling. Uncertainty in economics, pp.281-306.142.Testa F, Boiral O, Iraldo F, 2018, Internalization of environmental practices and institutional complexity, Can stakeholders pressures encourage greenwashing? Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 147, pp.287-307.143.Tibiletti V, Marchini P L, Furlotti K, et al., 2021, Does corporate governance matter in cor-porate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability”, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, Vol. 8, pp.896-907.144.Treacy R, Humphreys P, McIvor R, et al., 2019, ISO14001 certification and operating per-formance, A practice-based view, International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 208, pp.319-328.145.Wang E Z, Lee C, 2022, The impact of clean energy consumption on economic growth in China, is environmental regulation a curse or a blessing? International Review of Economics & Finance, Vol.77, pp.39-58.146.Wang J, Zhou Y, 2021, Impact of mass media on public awareness, The “Under the Dome” effect in China, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 173, pp.121145.147.Waxin M F, Knuteson S L, Bartholomew A, 2019, Outcomes and key factors of success for ISO 14001 certification, Evidence from an emerging arab gulf country, Sustainability, Vol. 12, pp.258.148.Wu J, Ma Z, 2016, Export intensity and MNE customers’ environmental requirements, Ef-fects on local Chinese suppliers’ environment strategies, Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 135, pp.327-339.149.Wu W, An S, Wu C H, et al., 2020, An empirical study on green environmental system certi-fication affects financing cost of high energy consumption enterprises-taking metallurgical enterprises as an example, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 244, pp.118848.150.Yang Z, Liu P, Luo L, 2024, How Does Environmental Regulation Affect Corporate Green Innovation, A Comparative Study between Voluntary and Mandatory Environmental Regu-lations, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol.26, pp.130-158.151.Yu Y, Choi Y, 2016, Stakeholder pressure and CSR adoption, The mediating role of organi-zational culture for Chinese companies, The Social Science Journal, Vol.53, pp.226–235.152.Zhang G, Zhang P, Zhang Z G, et al., 2019, Impact of environmental regulations on indus-trial structure upgrading, An empirical study on Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region in China, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 238, pp.117848.153.Zhang Y, Ruan H, Tang G, et al., 2021, Power of sustainable development, Does environ-mental management system certification affect a firm's access to finance? Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 30, pp.3772-3788.154.Zhang Y, Xing C, Wang Y, 2020, Does green innovation mitigate financing constraints? Ev-idence from China’s private enterprises, Journal of cleaner production, Vol. 264, pp.121698.155.Zhou D, Yuan S, Xie D, 2022, Voluntary environmental regulation and urban innovation, evidence from low-carbon pilot cities program in China, Technological Forecasting and So-cial Change, Vol. 175, pp.121388.
回到顶部